[Tue Jun 25 04:37:17 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (124.4, 377.1) = 6 55 6.78 -23 48 17.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 69.1 +/- 13.3
  Background counts = 42.6
  Rate = 0.0006 +/- 0.0001

[Tue Jun 25 04:37:17 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 13.84'
[Tue Jun 25 10:14:20 2013] Using EEF radius (= 13.35 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jun 25 10:14:20 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.35"
[Tue Jun 25 10:14:20 2013] source mask rpix=3.1, npix_max = 50, mask sum = 38, frac = 0.746
[Tue Jun 25 10:14:20 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 62 for pass 0, mean size = 13.35"
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:19 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src62.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:19 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src62.csv
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:19 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src62_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:19 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src62.csv
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:19 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src62_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src62.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:20 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src62.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:20 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src62.csv
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:20 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src62_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:20 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src62.csv
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:20 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src62_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src62.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 25 11:57:04 2013] Warning: source 62 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 38 at 17.598852 pixels away
[Tue Jun 25 11:57:04 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jun 25 11:57:04 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jun 25 11:57:04 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jun 25 11:57:04 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jun 25 11:57:04 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jun 25 17:26:11 2013] Using EEF radius (= 13.35 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jun 25 17:26:11 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.35"
[Tue Jun 25 17:26:11 2013] source mask rpix=3.1, npix_max = 50, mask sum = 38, frac = 0.746
[Tue Jun 25 17:26:11 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 61 for pass 1, mean size = 13.35"
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:04 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src61.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:04 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src61.csv
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:04 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src61_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:04 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src61.csv
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:04 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src61_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src61.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:05 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src61.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:05 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src61.csv
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:05 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src61_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:05 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src61.csv
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:05 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src61_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src61.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:48 2013] Warning: source 61 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 38 at 17.131730 pixels away
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:48 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:48 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:48 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:48 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:48 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00