[Tue Jun 25 04:37:16 2013] Detection parameters: Position = (256.4, 347.4) = 6 54 24.95 -23 50 32.7 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 751.4 +/- 32.9 Background counts = 57.6 Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.0005 [Tue Jun 25 04:37:17 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.68' [Tue Jun 25 10:14:20 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.77 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue Jun 25 10:14:20 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.77" [Tue Jun 25 10:14:20 2013] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 17, frac = 0.672 [Tue Jun 25 10:14:20 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 2 for pass 0, mean size = 8.77" [Tue Jun 25 11:56:19 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2.ximg exists [Tue Jun 25 11:56:19 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2.csv [Tue Jun 25 11:56:19 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2_1.ximg exists [Tue Jun 25 11:56:19 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2.csv [Tue Jun 25 11:56:19 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Jun 25 11:56:20 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2.ximg exists [Tue Jun 25 11:56:20 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2.csv [Tue Jun 25 11:56:20 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg exists [Tue Jun 25 11:56:20 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2.csv [Tue Jun 25 11:56:20 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Jun 25 11:57:04 2013] Source 3 is offset by -3.902922 and 1.043477 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.007641 x 1.007641, not incorporating fit results [Tue Jun 25 11:57:04 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue Jun 25 11:57:04 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue Jun 25 11:57:04 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Tue Jun 25 11:57:04 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Tue Jun 25 11:57:04 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue Jun 25 17:26:11 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.77 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue Jun 25 17:26:11 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.77" [Tue Jun 25 17:26:11 2013] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 17, frac = 0.672 [Tue Jun 25 17:26:11 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 2 for pass 1, mean size = 8.77" [Tue Jun 25 19:11:03 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2.ximg exists [Tue Jun 25 19:11:03 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2.csv [Tue Jun 25 19:11:03 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2_1.ximg exists [Tue Jun 25 19:11:03 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2.csv [Tue Jun 25 19:11:03 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Jun 25 19:11:04 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.ximg exists [Tue Jun 25 19:11:04 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.csv [Tue Jun 25 19:11:04 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg exists [Tue Jun 25 19:11:04 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.csv [Tue Jun 25 19:11:04 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Jun 25 19:11:47 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 1298.560000, observed total counts = 1012.000000 [Tue Jun 25 19:11:47 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 3 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Tue Jun 25 19:11:47 2013] Source 3 is offset by 2.769124 and -7.291606 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.042308 x 1.042308, not incorporating fit results [Tue Jun 25 19:11:48 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue Jun 25 19:11:48 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue Jun 25 19:11:48 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Tue Jun 25 19:11:48 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Tue Jun 25 19:11:48 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00