[Tue Jun 25 04:37:16 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (319.5, 216.0) = 6 54 4.94 -24 0 2.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 185.1 +/- 18.2
  Background counts = 58.1
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0002

[Tue Jun 25 04:37:17 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.17'
[Tue Jun 25 10:14:20 2013] Using EEF radius (= 9.51 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jun 25 10:14:20 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.51"
[Tue Jun 25 10:14:20 2013] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 28, mask sum = 24, frac = 0.831
[Tue Jun 25 10:14:20 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 16 for pass 0, mean size = 9.51"
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:19 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:19 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16.csv
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:19 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:19 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16.csv
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:19 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:20 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:20 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16.csv
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:20 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:20 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16.csv
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:20 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 25 11:57:04 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 632.368000, observed total counts = 518.000000
[Tue Jun 25 11:57:04 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 22
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue Jun 25 11:57:04 2013] Source 22 is offset by -0.255381 and -7.710948 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.094699 x 1.094699, not incorporating fit results
[Tue Jun 25 11:57:04 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jun 25 11:57:04 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jun 25 11:57:04 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jun 25 11:57:04 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jun 25 11:57:04 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jun 25 17:26:11 2013] Using EEF radius (= 9.51 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jun 25 17:26:11 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.51"
[Tue Jun 25 17:26:11 2013] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 28, mask sum = 24, frac = 0.831
[Tue Jun 25 17:26:11 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 16 for pass 1, mean size = 9.51"
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:03 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:03 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.csv
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:03 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:03 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.csv
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:03 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:04 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:04 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.csv
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:04 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:04 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.csv
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:04 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:47 2013] Warning, spatial fit 16 centroid is now closest to src. 56
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:48 2013] Source 22 is offset by -0.255381 and -7.710948 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.094699 x 1.094699, not incorporating fit results
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:48 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:48 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:48 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:48 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:48 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00