[Tue Jun 25 04:37:16 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (213.6, 316.1) = 6 54 38.55 -23 52 45.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 220.0 +/- 20.2
  Background counts = 52.6
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0002

[Tue Jun 25 04:37:17 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.29'
[Tue Jun 25 10:14:20 2013] Using EEF radius (= 9.57 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jun 25 10:14:20 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.57"
[Tue Jun 25 10:14:20 2013] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 29, mask sum = 30, frac = 1.029
[Tue Jun 25 10:14:20 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 12 for pass 0, mean size = 9.57"
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:19 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:19 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.csv
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:19 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:19 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.csv
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:19 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:20 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:20 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.csv
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:20 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:20 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.csv
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:20 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 25 11:57:04 2013] Warning: source 12 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 17 at 12.751175 pixels away
[Tue Jun 25 11:57:04 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jun 25 11:57:04 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jun 25 11:57:04 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jun 25 11:57:04 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jun 25 11:57:04 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jun 25 17:26:11 2013] Using EEF radius (= 9.57 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jun 25 17:26:11 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.57"
[Tue Jun 25 17:26:11 2013] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 29, mask sum = 30, frac = 1.029
[Tue Jun 25 17:26:11 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 12 for pass 1, mean size = 9.57"
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:03 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:03 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12.csv
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:03 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:03 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12.csv
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:03 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:04 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:04 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12.csv
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:04 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:04 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12.csv
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:04 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:47 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 625.320000, observed total counts = 499.000000
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:47 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 17
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:48 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:48 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:48 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:48 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:48 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00