[Tue Jun 25 04:36:41 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (210.5, 264.4) = 6 54 39.53 -23 56 31.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 84.1 +/- 13.7
  Background counts = 59.2
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0002

[Tue Jun 25 04:36:42 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.84'
[Tue Jun 25 08:40:51 2013] Using EEF radius (= 9.85 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jun 25 08:40:51 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.85"
[Tue Jun 25 08:40:51 2013] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 30, mask sum = 24, frac = 0.786
[Tue Jun 25 08:40:51 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 40 for pass 0, mean size = 9.85"
[Tue Jun 25 10:14:18 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src40.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 10:14:18 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src40.csv
[Tue Jun 25 10:14:18 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src40_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 10:14:18 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src40.csv
[Tue Jun 25 10:14:18 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src40_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src40.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 25 10:14:19 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src40.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 10:14:19 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src40.csv
[Tue Jun 25 10:14:19 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src40_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 10:14:19 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src40.csv
[Tue Jun 25 10:14:19 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src40_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src40.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:52 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 521.713000, observed total counts = 457.000000
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:52 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 28
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:52 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:52 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:52 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:52 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:52 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jun 25 16:06:01 2013] Using EEF radius (= 9.85 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jun 25 16:06:01 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.85"
[Tue Jun 25 16:06:01 2013] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 30, mask sum = 24, frac = 0.786
[Tue Jun 25 16:06:01 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 39 for pass 1, mean size = 9.85"
[Tue Jun 25 17:26:09 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src39.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 17:26:09 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src39.csv
[Tue Jun 25 17:26:09 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src39_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 17:26:09 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src39.csv
[Tue Jun 25 17:26:09 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src39_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src39.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 25 17:26:10 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src39.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 17:26:10 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src39.csv
[Tue Jun 25 17:26:10 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src39_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 17:26:10 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src39.csv
[Tue Jun 25 17:26:10 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src39_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src39.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:36 2013] Warning: source 39 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 28 at 10.602380 pixels away
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:36 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:36 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:36 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:36 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:36 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00