[Tue Jun 25 04:36:41 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (381.1, 288.1) = 6 53 45.42 -23 54 47.2
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 184.6 +/- 19.4
  Background counts = 54.1
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0003

[Tue Jun 25 04:36:42 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.04'
[Tue Jun 25 08:40:51 2013] Using EEF radius (= 9.45 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jun 25 08:40:51 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.45"
[Tue Jun 25 08:40:51 2013] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 28, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.261
[Tue Jun 25 08:40:51 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 11 for pass 0, mean size = 9.45"
[Tue Jun 25 10:14:18 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 10:14:18 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11.csv
[Tue Jun 25 10:14:18 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 10:14:18 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11.csv
[Tue Jun 25 10:14:18 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 25 10:14:19 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 10:14:19 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11.csv
[Tue Jun 25 10:14:19 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 10:14:19 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11.csv
[Tue Jun 25 10:14:19 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:52 2013] Warning: source 11 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 25 at 11.700530 pixels away
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:52 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:52 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:52 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:52 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:52 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jun 25 16:06:01 2013] Using EEF radius (= 9.45 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jun 25 16:06:01 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.45"
[Tue Jun 25 16:06:01 2013] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 28, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.261
[Tue Jun 25 16:06:01 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 11 for pass 1, mean size = 9.45"
[Tue Jun 25 17:26:09 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 17:26:09 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11.csv
[Tue Jun 25 17:26:09 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 17:26:09 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11.csv
[Tue Jun 25 17:26:09 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 25 17:26:10 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 17:26:10 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11.csv
[Tue Jun 25 17:26:10 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 17:26:10 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11.csv
[Tue Jun 25 17:26:10 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:36 2013] Source 25 is offset by -8.574459 and -1.737637 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.123945 x 1.123945, not incorporating fit results
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:36 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:36 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:36 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:36 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:36 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00