[Tue Nov 29 22:14:12 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (295.7, 275.7) = 0 3 6.60 -6 6 15.2
  Extent = 21.7" x 21.7", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 120.0 +/- 16.4
  Background counts = 244.2
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0006

[Tue Nov 29 22:14:12 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.66'
[Wed Nov 30 00:53:24 2011] Using EEF radius (= 7.26 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Nov 30 00:53:24 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.26"
[Wed Nov 30 00:53:24 2011] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 10, frac = 0.531
[Wed Nov 30 00:53:24 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 13 for pass 0, mean size = 7.26"
[Wed Nov 30 02:43:20 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0652010401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.ximg exists
[Wed Nov 30 02:43:20 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0652010401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.csv
[Wed Nov 30 02:43:20 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0652010401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13_1.ximg exists
[Wed Nov 30 02:43:20 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0652010401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.csv
[Wed Nov 30 02:43:20 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0652010401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0652010401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Nov 30 02:43:20 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0652010401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.ximg exists
[Wed Nov 30 02:43:20 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0652010401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg exists
[Wed Nov 30 02:43:20 2011] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0652010401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13 appears to have run properly
[Wed Nov 30 02:43:51 2011] Source 15 is offset by 7.400928 and -4.831636 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 6.526437 x 6.526437, not incorporating fit results
[Wed Nov 30 02:43:51 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Nov 30 02:43:51 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Nov 30 02:43:51 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Nov 30 02:43:51 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Nov 30 02:43:51 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Nov 30 05:01:39 2011] Using EEF radius (= 7.26 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Nov 30 05:01:39 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.26"
[Wed Nov 30 05:01:39 2011] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 10, frac = 0.531
[Wed Nov 30 05:01:39 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 13 for pass 1, mean size = 7.26"
[Wed Nov 30 06:30:50 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0652010401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.ximg exists
[Wed Nov 30 06:30:50 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0652010401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.csv
[Wed Nov 30 06:30:50 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0652010401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13_1.ximg exists
[Wed Nov 30 06:30:50 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0652010401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.csv
[Wed Nov 30 06:30:50 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0652010401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0652010401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Nov 30 06:30:50 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0652010401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.ximg exists
[Wed Nov 30 06:30:50 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0652010401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.csv
[Wed Nov 30 06:30:50 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0652010401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg exists
[Wed Nov 30 06:30:50 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0652010401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.csv
[Wed Nov 30 06:30:50 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0652010401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0652010401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Nov 30 06:31:11 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 14629.000000, observed total counts = 14628.000000
[Wed Nov 30 06:31:11 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 15 = 6.000351 pixels
[Wed Nov 30 06:31:11 2011] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 13 to 1
[Wed Nov 30 06:31:11 2011] 14518.200072 total counts/ 14518.200000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.000001
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 15 = 6.000351 pixels
  Position = (290.9, 272.1) = 0 3 8.01 -6 6 30.9
  Extent = 29.1 (29.1-58.3)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 0.0 +/- 120.5
  Background counts = 14518.2
  Rate = 2e-09 +/- 0.003
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability