[Sat Mar 24 23:31:30 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (246.9, 351.6) = 21 2 20.71 -24 26 59.6 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 72.8 +/- 13.5 Background counts = 43.1 Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.0009 [Sat Mar 24 23:31:32 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.37' [Sat Mar 24 23:35:30 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.11 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sat Mar 24 23:35:30 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.11" [Sat Mar 24 23:35:30 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 29, frac = 1.077 [Sat Mar 24 23:35:30 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 17 for pass 0, mean size = 9.11" [Sun Mar 25 02:25:46 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0652010301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.ximg exists [Sun Mar 25 02:25:46 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0652010301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.csv [Sun Mar 25 02:25:46 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0652010301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17_1.ximg exists [Sun Mar 25 02:25:46 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0652010301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.csv [Sun Mar 25 02:25:46 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0652010301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0652010301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Mar 25 02:25:46 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0652010301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.ximg exists [Sun Mar 25 02:25:46 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0652010301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.csv [Sun Mar 25 02:25:46 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0652010301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg exists [Sun Mar 25 02:25:46 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0652010301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.csv [Sun Mar 25 02:25:46 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0652010301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0652010301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Mar 25 04:48:55 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 656.840000, observed total counts = 538.000000 [Sun Mar 25 04:48:55 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 17 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Sun Mar 25 04:48:56 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sun Mar 25 04:48:56 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sun Mar 25 04:48:56 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Sun Mar 25 04:48:56 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Sun Mar 25 04:48:56 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sun Mar 25 04:48:56 2012] Source is confused with source 18 [Sun Mar 25 04:49:31 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.11 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun Mar 25 04:49:31 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.11" [Sun Mar 25 04:49:31 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 29, frac = 1.077 [Sun Mar 25 04:49:31 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 17 for pass 1, mean size = 9.11" [Sun Mar 25 06:46:34 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0652010301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.ximg exists [Sun Mar 25 06:46:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0652010301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.csv [Sun Mar 25 06:46:34 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0652010301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17_1.ximg exists [Sun Mar 25 06:46:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0652010301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.csv [Sun Mar 25 06:46:34 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0652010301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0652010301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Mar 25 06:46:35 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0652010301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.ximg exists [Sun Mar 25 06:46:35 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0652010301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.csv [Sun Mar 25 06:46:35 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0652010301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg exists [Sun Mar 25 06:46:35 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0652010301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.csv [Sun Mar 25 06:46:35 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0652010301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0652010301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Mar 25 09:03:42 2012] Warning, spatial fit 17 centroid is now closest to src. 18 [Sun Mar 25 09:03:42 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sun Mar 25 09:03:42 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sun Mar 25 09:03:42 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Sun Mar 25 09:03:42 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Sun Mar 25 09:03:42 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sun Mar 25 09:04:09 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(21432.793777, 30539.242920, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Sun Mar 25 09:04:09 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0652010301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src17_src.reg [Sun Mar 25 09:04:09 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0652010301_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (209, 314) - (284, 389) [Sun Mar 25 09:04:10 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(21432.793777, 30539.242920, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21995.779465, 30260.281647, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(19049.794800, 28809.552399, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Sun Mar 25 09:04:10 2012] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0652010301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src17.gif [Sun Mar 25 09:38:18 2012] Mean detx,y = (4302.53, 4725.15) [Sun Mar 25 09:38:23 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum [Sun Mar 25 09:39:00 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin [Sun Mar 25 09:39:01 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0652010301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src17_src_b10.pi.gz [Sun Mar 25 09:39:01 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0652010301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src17_bgd.pi.gz [Mon Mar 26 00:46:15 2012] Not generating rmf since there are only 72 counts [Mon Mar 26 00:46:15 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts [Mon Mar 26 05:47:06 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products [Mon Mar 26 05:47:06 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_pn_xmm0652010301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src17_src_b10.pi.gz [Mon Mar 26 05:47:08 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00 [Mon Mar 26 05:47:08 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00464, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0652010301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src17.arf [Mon Mar 26 05:47:08 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass [Mon Mar 26 05:47:08 2012] Updating source flux to 1.5e-14 [Mon Mar 26 05:50:00 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting