[Sat Jun  9 07:08:50 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (346.2, 330.9) = 16 54 24.22 -36 49 20.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 35.2 +/- 8.2
  Background counts = 11.1
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0004

[Sat Jun  9 07:08:51 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.19'
[Sat Jun  9 07:37:10 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.52 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jun  9 07:37:10 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.52"
[Sat Jun  9 07:37:10 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 24, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.033
[Sat Jun  9 07:37:10 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 8.52"
[Sat Jun  9 07:51:52 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0651870401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 07:51:52 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0651870401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Sat Jun  9 07:51:52 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0651870401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 07:51:52 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0651870401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Sat Jun  9 07:51:52 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0651870401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0651870401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun  9 07:51:52 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0651870401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 07:51:52 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0651870401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 07:51:52 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0651870401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly
[Sat Jun  9 07:51:59 2012] Warning: source 9 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 2 at 11.700228 pixels away
[Sat Jun  9 07:51:59 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Jun  9 07:51:59 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Jun  9 07:51:59 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Jun  9 07:51:59 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Jun  9 07:51:59 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Jun  9 08:18:22 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.52 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jun  9 08:18:22 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.52"
[Sat Jun  9 08:18:22 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 24, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.033
[Sat Jun  9 08:18:22 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 8 for pass 1, mean size = 8.52"
[Sat Jun  9 08:29:49 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0651870401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 08:29:49 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0651870401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 08:29:49 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0651870401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8 appears to have run properly
[Sat Jun  9 08:29:49 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0651870401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 08:29:49 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0651870401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 08:29:49 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0651870401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8 appears to have run properly
[Sat Jun  9 08:29:55 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 135.952000, observed total counts = 135.000000
[Sat Jun  9 08:29:55 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 2 = 0.236918 pixels
[Sat Jun  9 08:29:55 2012] 136.041400 total counts/ 119.737000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.490015
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 2 = 0.236918 pixels
  Position = (346.3, 331.2) = 16 54 24.19 -36 49 20.2
  Extent = 2.2 (2.1-3.0)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 16.3 +/- 11.7
  Background counts = 119.7
  Rate = 0.0006 +/- 0.0004
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability