[Sun Jun 24 08:12:59 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (292.6, 315.7) = 22 8 10.19 54 32 43.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 146.4 +/- 26.5
  Background counts = 437.5
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0007

[Sun Jun 24 08:12:59 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.32'
[Sun Jun 24 08:23:01 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.09 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun 24 08:23:01 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.09"
[Sun Jun 24 08:23:01 2012] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.882
[Sun Jun 24 08:23:01 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 13 for pass 0, mean size = 7.09"
[Sun Jun 24 20:31:03 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0650640101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 24 20:31:03 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0650640101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.csv
[Sun Jun 24 20:31:03 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0650640101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 24 20:31:03 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0650640101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.csv
[Sun Jun 24 20:31:03 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0650640101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0650640101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun 24 20:31:04 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0650640101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 24 20:31:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0650640101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.csv
[Sun Jun 24 20:31:04 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0650640101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 24 20:31:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0650640101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.csv
[Sun Jun 24 20:31:04 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0650640101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0650640101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun 24 23:11:02 2012] Source 13 is offset by 1.123551 and -7.788903 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 6.508966 x 6.508966, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Jun 24 23:11:02 2012] Source 13 is offset by 4.362264 and -7.265846 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 6.519035 x 6.519035, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Jun 24 23:11:02 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jun 24 23:11:02 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jun 24 23:11:02 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Jun 24 23:11:02 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jun 24 23:11:02 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jun 24 23:11:02 2012] Source is confused with source 12
[Sun Jun 24 23:11:17 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.09 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun 24 23:11:17 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.09"
[Sun Jun 24 23:11:17 2012] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.882
[Sun Jun 24 23:11:17 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 13 for pass 1, mean size = 7.09"
[Mon Jun 25 08:32:25 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0650640101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 25 08:32:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0650640101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.csv
[Mon Jun 25 08:32:25 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0650640101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 25 08:32:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0650640101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.csv
[Mon Jun 25 08:32:25 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0650640101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0650640101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 25 08:32:26 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0650640101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 25 08:32:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0650640101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.csv
[Mon Jun 25 08:32:26 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0650640101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 25 08:32:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0650640101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.csv
[Mon Jun 25 08:32:26 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0650640101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0650640101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 25 09:56:46 2012] Warning, spatial fit 13 centroid is now closest to src. 12
[Mon Jun 25 09:56:46 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jun 25 09:56:46 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jun 25 09:56:46 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jun 25 09:56:46 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jun 25 09:56:46 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jun 25 09:56:47 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0