[Tue May 7 08:29:25 2013] Detection parameters: Position = (266.7, 311.1) = 0 43 4.08 41 16 1.9 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 282.4 +/- 24.8 Background counts = 178.9 Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.001 [Tue May 7 08:29:26 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.48' [Tue May 7 08:30:27 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.67 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue May 7 08:30:27 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.67" [Tue May 7 08:30:27 2013] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 14, frac = 0.684 [Tue May 7 08:30:27 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 89 for pass 0, mean size = 7.67" [Tue May 7 08:30:31 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89.ximg exists [Tue May 7 08:30:31 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89.csv [Tue May 7 08:30:31 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89_1.ximg exists [Tue May 7 08:30:31 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89.csv [Tue May 7 08:30:31 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue May 7 08:30:33 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89.ximg exists [Tue May 7 08:30:33 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89.csv [Tue May 7 08:30:33 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89_1.ximg exists [Tue May 7 08:30:33 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89.csv [Tue May 7 08:30:33 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue May 7 08:31:04 2013] Warning, spatial fit 89 centroid is now closest to src. 24 [Tue May 7 08:31:05 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue May 7 08:31:05 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue May 7 08:31:05 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Tue May 7 08:31:05 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Tue May 7 08:31:05 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue May 7 08:32:04 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.67 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue May 7 08:32:04 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.67" [Tue May 7 08:32:04 2013] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 14, frac = 0.684 [Tue May 7 08:32:04 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 82 for pass 1, mean size = 7.67" [Tue May 7 08:32:06 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src82.ximg exists [Tue May 7 08:32:06 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src82.csv [Tue May 7 08:32:06 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src82_1.ximg exists [Tue May 7 08:32:06 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src82.csv [Tue May 7 08:32:06 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src82_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src82.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue May 7 08:32:08 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src82.ximg exists [Tue May 7 08:32:08 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src82.csv [Tue May 7 08:32:08 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src82_1.ximg exists [Tue May 7 08:32:08 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src82.csv [Tue May 7 08:32:08 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src82_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src82.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue May 7 08:32:38 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = -518.615000, observed total counts = 4931.000000 [Tue May 7 08:32:38 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 95 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Tue May 7 08:32:38 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 2738.610000, observed total counts = 2164.000000 [Tue May 7 08:32:38 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 95 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Tue May 7 08:32:38 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue May 7 08:32:38 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue May 7 08:32:38 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Tue May 7 08:32:38 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Tue May 7 08:32:38 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue May 7 08:33:39 2013] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(23154.045288, 27021.114044, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Tue May 7 08:33:39 2013] Not overwriting source region fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src95_src.reg [Tue May 7 08:33:39 2013] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (229, 274) - (304, 349) [Tue May 7 08:33:39 2013] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(23154.045288, 27021.114044, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21686.363400, 25589.215400, 450.752813, 450.752813, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27245.704000, 27382.742200, 3815.664110, 3815.664110, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23230.926971, 29309.539551, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24117.145000, 27079.190620, 368.310411, 368.310411, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23410.818481, 26203.678314, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25328.917847, 28475.947968, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24829.735168, 28643.326324, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25930.518000, 27462.792000, 1097.240032, 1097.240032, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25135.416656, 27896.641815, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25128.760498, 27276.389801, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24471.975281, 26344.652405, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25180.037079, 25359.118805, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23884.085419, 24424.832581, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Tue May 7 08:33:39 2013] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src95.gif [Tue May 7 09:58:47 2013] Mean detx,y = (-3982.05, 1455.60) [Tue May 7 09:58:50 2013] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum [Tue May 7 09:59:03 2013] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin [Tue May 7 09:59:03 2013] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src95_src_b10.pi.gz [Tue May 7 09:59:03 2013] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src95_bgd.pi.gz [Wed May 8 03:06:53 2013] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done [Wed May 8 03:06:53 2013] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts [Wed May 8 03:25:50 2013] Updating aperture counts using extracted products [Wed May 8 03:25:50 2013] Total counts from fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src95_src_b10.pi.gz = 1357.00 [Wed May 8 03:25:50 2013] Total counts from fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src95_bgd.pi.gz = 3413.00 [Wed May 8 03:25:51 2013] Got source and background scale factors 1038069.000000, 4653992.000000 [Wed May 8 03:25:51 2013] User source parameters: Position = (266.7, 311.1) = 0 43 4.08 41 16 1.9 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 Source aperture counts = 595.7 +/- 37.8 Background aperture counts = 761.3 Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.001 [Wed May 8 03:25:51 2013] Updating counts from extracted products [Wed May 8 03:25:51 2013] Set source signif. to 595.73/27.59 = 21.59 [Wed May 8 03:25:58 2013] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00 [Wed May 8 03:25:58 2013] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.0215, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src95.arf [Wed May 8 03:25:58 2013] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass [Wed May 8 03:25:58 2013] Updating source flux to 1e-13 [Wed May 8 03:27:31 2013] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting [Wed May 8 03:27:55 2013] xmm0650560301/analysis//spectral/fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src95_pl.csv not found, spectral fit skipped or did not complete