[Tue May 7 08:29:25 2013] Detection parameters: Position = (361.7, 318.7) = 0 42 27.41 41 16 41.4 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 119.8 +/- 21.0 Background counts = 158.9 Rate = 0.006 +/- 0.001 [Tue May 7 08:29:26 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.82' [Tue May 7 08:30:27 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.84 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue May 7 08:30:27 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.84" [Tue May 7 08:30:27 2013] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 15, frac = 0.585 [Tue May 7 08:30:27 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 83 for pass 0, mean size = 8.84" [Tue May 7 08:30:31 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src83.ximg exists [Tue May 7 08:30:31 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src83.csv [Tue May 7 08:30:31 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src83_1.ximg exists [Tue May 7 08:30:31 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src83.csv [Tue May 7 08:30:31 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src83_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src83.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue May 7 08:30:33 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src83.ximg exists [Tue May 7 08:30:33 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src83.csv [Tue May 7 08:30:33 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src83_1.ximg exists [Tue May 7 08:30:33 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src83.csv [Tue May 7 08:30:33 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src83_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src83.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue May 7 08:31:04 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 2250.650000, observed total counts = 1543.000000 [Tue May 7 08:31:04 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 88 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Tue May 7 08:31:04 2013] Warning, spatial fit 83 centroid is now closest to src. 84 [Tue May 7 08:31:05 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue May 7 08:31:05 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue May 7 08:31:05 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Tue May 7 08:31:05 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Tue May 7 08:31:05 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue May 7 08:31:05 2013] Source is confused with source 94 [Tue May 7 08:32:04 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.84 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue May 7 08:32:04 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.84" [Tue May 7 08:32:04 2013] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 15, frac = 0.585 [Tue May 7 08:32:04 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 76 for pass 1, mean size = 8.84" [Tue May 7 08:32:06 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src76.ximg exists [Tue May 7 08:32:06 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src76.csv [Tue May 7 08:32:06 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src76_1.ximg exists [Tue May 7 08:32:06 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src76.csv [Tue May 7 08:32:06 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src76_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src76.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue May 7 08:32:08 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src76.ximg exists [Tue May 7 08:32:08 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src76.csv [Tue May 7 08:32:08 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src76_1.ximg exists [Tue May 7 08:32:08 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src76.csv [Tue May 7 08:32:08 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src76_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src76.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue May 7 08:32:38 2013] Warning, spatial fit 76 centroid is now closest to src. 79 [Tue May 7 08:32:38 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue May 7 08:32:38 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue May 7 08:32:38 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Tue May 7 08:32:38 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Tue May 7 08:32:38 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue May 7 08:33:38 2013] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(31422.504791, 27680.695007, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Tue May 7 08:33:38 2013] Not overwriting source region fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src88_src.reg [Tue May 7 08:33:38 2013] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (324, 281) - (399, 356) [Tue May 7 08:33:38 2013] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(31422.504791, 27680.695007, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(32440.719147, 26609.738495, 2610.000000, 2610.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28913.033680, 27033.576400, 1331.383238, 1279.113637, 345.508600, X, Y) && !ellipse(27245.704000, 27382.742200, 3815.664110, 3815.664110, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(30606.293030, 27438.999725, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29369.290985, 29337.783752, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34190.367523, 29373.385040, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(32095.453827, 28740.829620, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28934.370636, 27979.980530, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(35037.806000, 28290.166000, 1699.664049, 1699.664049, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29436.784485, 27808.186859, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29968.862976, 27500.296387, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(31539.740265, 27047.905945, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(31391.000214, 26113.330322, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(31130.358643, 25530.726624, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(32399.754700, 24723.770294, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Tue May 7 08:33:38 2013] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src88.gif [Tue May 7 09:49:55 2013] Mean detx,y = (3572.28, -2019.23) [Tue May 7 09:49:58 2013] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum [Tue May 7 09:50:14 2013] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin [Tue May 7 09:50:14 2013] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src88_src_b10.pi.gz [Tue May 7 09:50:14 2013] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src88_bgd.pi.gz [Wed May 8 01:48:00 2013] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done [Wed May 8 01:48:00 2013] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts [Wed May 8 03:25:49 2013] Updating aperture counts using extracted products [Wed May 8 03:25:49 2013] Total counts from fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src88_src_b10.pi.gz = 1304.00 [Wed May 8 03:25:49 2013] Total counts from fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src88_bgd.pi.gz = 592.00 [Wed May 8 03:25:49 2013] Got source and background scale factors 1042589.000000, 990868.000000 [Wed May 8 03:25:49 2013] User source parameters: Position = (361.7, 318.7) = 0 42 27.41 41 16 41.4 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 Source aperture counts = 681.1 +/- 37.1 Background aperture counts = 622.9 Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.001 [Wed May 8 03:25:49 2013] Updating counts from extracted products [Wed May 8 03:25:49 2013] Set source signif. to 681.10/24.96 = 27.29 [Wed May 8 03:25:58 2013] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00 [Wed May 8 03:25:58 2013] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.0246, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src88.arf [Wed May 8 03:25:58 2013] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass [Wed May 8 03:25:58 2013] Updating source flux to 1.2e-13 [Wed May 8 03:27:31 2013] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting [Wed May 8 03:27:55 2013] xmm0650560301/analysis//spectral/fullrun_pn_xmm0650560301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src88_pl.csv not found, spectral fit skipped or did not complete