[Mon Mar 26 14:24:43 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (297.0, 298.0) = 21 16 6.19 -23 11 24.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 50.5 +/- 9.7
  Background counts = 4.2
  Rate = 0.007 +/- 0.001

[Mon Mar 26 14:24:43 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 0.11'
[Mon Mar 26 17:07:53 2012] Using EEF radius (= 6.48 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Mar 26 17:07:53 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 6.48"
[Mon Mar 26 17:07:53 2012] source mask rpix=1.5, npix_max = 15, mask sum = 16, frac = 1.010
[Mon Mar 26 17:07:53 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 14 for pass 0, mean size = 6.48"
[Mon Mar 26 19:52:15 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0650383901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 26 19:52:15 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0650383901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14_1.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 26 19:52:15 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0650383901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14 appears to have run properly
[Mon Mar 26 19:52:16 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0650383901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 26 19:52:16 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0650383901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 26 19:52:16 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0650383901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14 appears to have run properly
[Mon Mar 26 22:14:33 2012] Warning, spatial fit 14 centroid is now closest to src. 16
[Mon Mar 26 22:14:33 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Mar 26 22:14:33 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Mar 26 22:14:33 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Mar 26 22:14:33 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Mar 26 22:14:33 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Mar 26 22:14:33 2012] Source is confused with source 16
[Mon Mar 26 23:50:09 2012] Using EEF radius (= 6.48 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Mar 26 23:50:09 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 6.48"
[Mon Mar 26 23:50:09 2012] source mask rpix=1.5, npix_max = 15, mask sum = 16, frac = 1.010
[Mon Mar 26 23:50:09 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 10 for pass 1, mean size = 6.48"
[Tue Mar 27 01:17:59 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0650383901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 27 01:17:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0650383901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.csv
[Tue Mar 27 01:17:59 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0650383901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10_1.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 27 01:17:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0650383901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.csv
[Tue Mar 27 01:17:59 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0650383901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0650383901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Mar 27 01:18:00 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0650383901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 27 01:18:00 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0650383901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 27 01:18:00 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0650383901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10 appears to have run properly
[Tue Mar 27 03:07:45 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 253.285000, observed total counts = 253.000000
[Tue Mar 27 03:07:45 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 17 = 1.577397 pixels
[Tue Mar 27 03:07:45 2012] 203.977400 total counts/ 191.219000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.922637
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 17 = 1.577397 pixels
  Position = (296.3, 299.5) = 21 16 6.41 -23 11 19.3
  Extent = 4.5 (1.6-8.3)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 12.8 +/- 14.3
  Background counts = 191.2
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.002
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability