[Mon Feb 20 13:52:09 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (292.6, 309.2) = 15 52 0.98 -2 8 31.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 22.4 +/- 6.9
  Background counts = 3.7
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.001

[Mon Feb 20 13:52:09 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 0.89'
[Mon Feb 20 14:40:01 2012] Using EEF radius (= 6.87 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Feb 20 14:40:01 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 6.87"
[Mon Feb 20 14:40:01 2012] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 17, mask sum = 20, frac = 1.156
[Mon Feb 20 14:40:01 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 12 for pass 0, mean size = 6.87"
[Mon Feb 20 15:21:35 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0650382901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.ximg exists
[Mon Feb 20 15:21:35 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0650382901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12_1.ximg exists
[Mon Feb 20 15:21:35 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0650382901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12 appears to have run properly
[Mon Feb 20 15:21:35 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0650382901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.ximg exists
[Mon Feb 20 15:21:35 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0650382901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.csv
[Mon Feb 20 15:21:35 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0650382901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg exists
[Mon Feb 20 15:21:35 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0650382901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.csv
[Mon Feb 20 15:21:35 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0650382901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0650382901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Feb 20 15:58:47 2012] Source 12 is offset by -5.769121 and -6.597841 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 6.164644 x 3.844575, not incorporating fit results
[Mon Feb 20 15:58:47 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Feb 20 15:58:47 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Feb 20 15:58:47 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Feb 20 15:58:47 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Feb 20 15:58:47 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Feb 20 15:58:47 2012] Source is confused with source 8
[Mon Feb 20 16:38:18 2012] Using EEF radius (= 6.87 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Feb 20 16:38:18 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 6.87"
[Mon Feb 20 16:38:18 2012] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 17, mask sum = 20, frac = 1.156
[Mon Feb 20 16:38:18 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 10 for pass 1, mean size = 6.87"
[Mon Feb 20 17:18:04 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0650382901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.ximg exists
[Mon Feb 20 17:18:04 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0650382901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10_1.ximg exists
[Mon Feb 20 17:18:04 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0650382901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10 appears to have run properly
[Mon Feb 20 17:18:04 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0650382901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.ximg exists
[Mon Feb 20 17:18:04 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0650382901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg exists
[Mon Feb 20 17:18:04 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0650382901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10 appears to have run properly
[Mon Feb 20 18:01:31 2012] Source 12 is offset by -2.642547 and -3.988738 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.725775 x 0.725775, not incorporating fit results
[Mon Feb 20 18:01:31 2012] Warning, spatial fit 10 centroid is now closest to src. 8
[Mon Feb 20 18:01:31 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Feb 20 18:01:31 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Feb 20 18:01:31 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Feb 20 18:01:31 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Feb 20 18:01:31 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Feb 20 18:01:31 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0