[Sun Mar 25 10:18:55 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (271.2, 258.9) = 6 11 50.91 -30 38 53.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 61.6 +/- 11.7
  Background counts = 14.1
  Rate = 0.009 +/- 0.002

[Sun Mar 25 10:18:55 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.48'
[Sun Mar 25 13:08:44 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.17 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Mar 25 13:08:44 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.17"
[Sun Mar 25 13:08:44 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 22, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.884
[Sun Mar 25 13:08:44 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 8.17"
[Sun Mar 25 14:08:25 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0650381501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 25 14:08:25 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0650381501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 25 14:08:25 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0650381501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9 appears to have run properly
[Sun Mar 25 14:08:25 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0650381501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 25 14:08:25 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0650381501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 25 14:08:25 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0650381501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly
[Sun Mar 25 14:08:50 2012] Source 14 is offset by 2.011440 and -7.535849 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.938901 x 0.938901, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Mar 25 14:08:50 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Mar 25 14:08:50 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Mar 25 14:08:50 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Mar 25 14:08:50 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Mar 25 14:08:50 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Mar 25 14:08:50 2012] Source is confused with source 15
[Sun Mar 25 16:50:09 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.17 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Mar 25 16:50:09 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.17"
[Sun Mar 25 16:50:09 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 22, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.884
[Sun Mar 25 16:50:09 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 7 for pass 1, mean size = 8.17"
[Sun Mar 25 17:29:28 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0650381501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 25 17:29:28 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0650381501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.csv
[Sun Mar 25 17:29:28 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0650381501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7_1.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 25 17:29:28 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0650381501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.csv
[Sun Mar 25 17:29:28 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0650381501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0650381501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Mar 25 17:29:28 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0650381501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 25 17:29:28 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0650381501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7_1.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 25 17:29:28 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0650381501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7 appears to have run properly
[Sun Mar 25 17:29:46 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 293.001000, observed total counts = 293.000000
[Sun Mar 25 17:29:46 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 14 = 0.766383 pixels
[Sun Mar 25 17:29:46 2012] 271.721300 total counts/ 257.446000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.889697
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 14 = 0.766383 pixels
  Position = (270.6, 258.4) = 6 11 51.11 -30 38 54.2
  Extent = 3.2 (2.0-6.1)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 14.3 +/- 16.5
  Background counts = 257.4
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.002
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability