[Sun Mar 25 10:18:06 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (287.2, 298.9) = 6 11 45.53 -30 35 59.2
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 52.3 +/- 11.0
  Background counts = 15.4
  Rate = 0.007 +/- 0.002

[Sun Mar 25 10:18:07 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 0.82'
[Sun Mar 25 11:43:10 2012] Using EEF radius (= 6.84 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Mar 25 11:43:10 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 6.84"
[Sun Mar 25 11:43:10 2012] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 17, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.932
[Sun Mar 25 11:43:10 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 13 for pass 0, mean size = 6.84"
[Sun Mar 25 13:08:44 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0650381501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 25 13:08:44 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0650381501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.csv
[Sun Mar 25 13:08:44 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0650381501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13_1.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 25 13:08:44 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0650381501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.csv
[Sun Mar 25 13:08:44 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0650381501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0650381501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Mar 25 13:08:44 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0650381501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 25 13:08:44 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0650381501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 25 13:08:44 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0650381501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13 appears to have run properly
[Sun Mar 25 14:08:44 2012] Source 5 is offset by 4.328774 and -1.034551 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.830092 x 6.640736, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Mar 25 14:08:44 2012] Source 5 is offset by -5.849778 and -7.388988 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.785940 x 0.785940, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Mar 25 14:08:44 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Mar 25 14:08:44 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Mar 25 14:08:44 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Mar 25 14:08:44 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Mar 25 14:08:44 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Mar 25 14:08:44 2012] Source is confused with source 7
[Sun Mar 25 15:19:45 2012] Using EEF radius (= 6.84 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Mar 25 15:19:45 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 6.84"
[Sun Mar 25 15:19:45 2012] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 17, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.932
[Sun Mar 25 15:19:45 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 12 for pass 1, mean size = 6.84"
[Sun Mar 25 16:50:09 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0650381501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 25 16:50:09 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0650381501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12_1.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 25 16:50:09 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0650381501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12 appears to have run properly
[Sun Mar 25 16:50:09 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0650381501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 25 16:50:09 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0650381501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 25 16:50:09 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0650381501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12 appears to have run properly
[Sun Mar 25 17:29:42 2012] Source 5 is offset by 3.852475 and -0.411563 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.788538 x 1.788538, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Mar 25 17:29:42 2012] Source 5 is offset by 3.520061 and -1.733379 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.830092 x 0.830092, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Mar 25 17:29:42 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 388.904000, observed total counts = 389.000000
[Sun Mar 25 17:29:42 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 5 = 0.499346 pixels
[Sun Mar 25 17:29:42 2012] 382.006390 total counts/ 373.821000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.423358
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 5 = 0.499346 pixels
  Position = (287.5, 298.5) = 6 11 45.42 -30 35 60.0
  Extent = 1.8 (1.7-3.2)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 8.2 +/- 19.5
  Background counts = 373.8
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.003
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability