[Sat Jun 1 17:48:46 2013] Detection parameters: Position = (273.5, 350.2) = 8 22 10.42 -42 55 3.0 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 428.7 +/- 46.5 Background counts = 848.2 Rate = 0.03 +/- 0.003 [Sat Jun 1 17:49:11 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.16' [Sat Jun 1 17:53:16 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.51 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sat Jun 1 17:53:16 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.51" [Sat Jun 1 17:53:16 2013] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 24, mask sum = 22, frac = 0.912 [Sat Jun 1 17:53:16 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 164 for pass 0, mean size = 8.51" [Sat Jun 1 17:54:33 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sat Jun 1 17:54:33 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sat Jun 1 17:54:33 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Sat Jun 1 17:54:33 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Sat Jun 1 17:54:33 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sat Jun 1 17:54:34 2013] Source is confused with source 76 [Sat Jun 1 17:56:56 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.51 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sat Jun 1 17:56:56 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.51" [Sat Jun 1 17:56:56 2013] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 24, mask sum = 22, frac = 0.912 [Sat Jun 1 17:56:56 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 158 for pass 1, mean size = 8.51" [Sat Jun 1 17:57:56 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 12627.500000, observed total counts = 11392.000000 [Sat Jun 1 17:57:56 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 211 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Sat Jun 1 17:57:58 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sat Jun 1 17:57:58 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sat Jun 1 17:57:58 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Sat Jun 1 17:57:58 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Sat Jun 1 17:57:58 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sun Jun 2 09:53:03 2013] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(23745.251282, 30415.930084, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Sun Jun 2 09:53:03 2013] Not overwriting source region fullrun_mos1_xmm0650221401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src211_src.reg [Sun Jun 2 09:53:03 2013] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_mos1_xmm0650221401_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (236, 313) - (311, 388) [Sun Jun 2 09:53:03 2013] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(23745.251282, 30415.930084, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26838.668600, 33433.201000, 1533.784044, 1533.784044, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(31927.404000, 29800.158000, 9815.952282, 9815.952282, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21123.800140, 27511.800629, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22615.284000, 29141.398000, 750.896022, 750.896022, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21826.364700, 28395.681122, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23341.936401, 29970.655121, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22816.389200, 27972.970000, 1215.696035, 1215.696035, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23925.372000, 29892.290000, 1315.744038, 1315.744038, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23307.474121, 29343.842529, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25603.676208, 28102.127808, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(33830.278000, 31635.908000, 10886.160313, 10886.160313, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24043.148224, 31613.438568, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25135.674194, 32561.669006, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23719.590424, 30910.174408, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23443.634000, 26793.632000, 2431.392070, 2431.392070, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26427.202576, 27776.690247, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25746.436000, 27623.450000, 1175.824034, 1175.824034, 0.000000, X, Y) [Sun Jun 2 09:53:03 2013] Writing fullrun_mos1_xmm0650221401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src211.gif