[Tue Sep  4 23:58:21 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (281.7, 403.0) = 5 34 40.68 22 6 43.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 579.7 +/- 38.3
  Background counts = 361.3
  Rate = 0.03 +/- 0.002

[Tue Sep  4 23:58:23 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.67'
[Wed Sep  5 05:33:27 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.27 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Sep  5 05:33:27 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.27"
[Wed Sep  5 05:33:27 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 32, mask sum = 23, frac = 0.703
[Wed Sep  5 05:33:27 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 93 for pass 0, mean size = 10.27"
[Wed Sep  5 12:11:24 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0611181501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src93.ximg exists
[Wed Sep  5 12:11:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0611181501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src93.csv
[Wed Sep  5 12:11:24 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0611181501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src93_1.ximg exists
[Wed Sep  5 12:11:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0611181501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src93.csv
[Wed Sep  5 12:11:24 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0611181501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src93_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0611181501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src93.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Sep  5 12:11:27 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0611181501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src93.ximg exists
[Wed Sep  5 12:11:27 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0611181501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src93.csv
[Wed Sep  5 12:11:27 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0611181501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src93_1.ximg exists
[Wed Sep  5 12:11:27 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0611181501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src93.csv
[Wed Sep  5 12:11:27 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0611181501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src93_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0611181501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src93.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Sep  5 12:12:16 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 7481.880000, observed total counts = 4762.000000
[Wed Sep  5 12:12:16 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 57
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Wed Sep  5 12:12:16 2012] Warning, spatial fit 93 centroid is now closest to src. 71
[Wed Sep  5 12:12:16 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Sep  5 12:12:16 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Sep  5 12:12:16 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Sep  5 12:12:16 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Sep  5 12:12:16 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Sep  5 12:12:17 2012] Source is confused with source 48
[Wed Sep  5 21:35:20 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.27 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Sep  5 21:35:20 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.27"
[Wed Sep  5 21:35:20 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 32, mask sum = 23, frac = 0.703
[Wed Sep  5 21:35:20 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 86 for pass 1, mean size = 10.27"
[Thu Sep  6 05:21:42 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0611181501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src86.ximg exists
[Thu Sep  6 05:21:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0611181501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src86.csv
[Thu Sep  6 05:21:42 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0611181501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src86_1.ximg exists
[Thu Sep  6 05:21:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0611181501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src86.csv
[Thu Sep  6 05:21:42 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0611181501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src86_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0611181501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src86.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Sep  6 05:21:43 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0611181501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src86.ximg exists
[Thu Sep  6 05:21:43 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0611181501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src86.csv
[Thu Sep  6 05:21:43 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0611181501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src86_1.ximg exists
[Thu Sep  6 05:21:43 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0611181501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src86.csv
[Thu Sep  6 05:21:43 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0611181501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src86_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0611181501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src86.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Sep  6 05:22:15 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 6308.650000, observed total counts = 5667.000000
[Thu Sep  6 05:22:15 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 57
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Thu Sep  6 05:22:15 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 6688.560000, observed total counts = 6635.000000
[Thu Sep  6 05:22:15 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 57 = 0.615093 pixels
[Thu Sep  6 05:22:15 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 86 to 95
[Thu Sep  6 05:22:15 2012] 6445.614100 total counts/ 6379.620000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.826243
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 57 = 0.615093 pixels
  Position = (281.5, 402.4) = 5 34 40.74 22 6 51.5
  Extent = 3.5 (2.6-7.0)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 66.0 +/- 80.3
  Background counts = 6379.6
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.004
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability