[Tue Sep 4 23:57:16 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (387.7, 336.0) = 5 34 7.53 22 2 1.1 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 1100.1 +/- 49.5 Background counts = 493.4 Rate = 0.08 +/- 0.003 [Tue Sep 4 23:57:19 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.02' [Wed Sep 5 00:01:41 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.94 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Wed Sep 5 00:01:41 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.94" [Wed Sep 5 00:01:41 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 31, mask sum = 22, frac = 0.709 [Wed Sep 5 00:01:41 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 13 for pass 0, mean size = 9.94" [Wed Sep 5 05:33:24 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0611181501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.ximg exists [Wed Sep 5 05:33:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0611181501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.csv [Wed Sep 5 05:33:24 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0611181501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13_1.ximg exists [Wed Sep 5 05:33:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0611181501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.csv [Wed Sep 5 05:33:24 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0611181501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0611181501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Sep 5 05:33:26 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0611181501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.ximg exists [Wed Sep 5 05:33:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0611181501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.csv [Wed Sep 5 05:33:26 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0611181501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg exists [Wed Sep 5 05:33:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0611181501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.csv [Wed Sep 5 05:33:26 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0611181501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0611181501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Sep 5 12:11:54 2012] Warning: source 13 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 16 at 11.742128 pixels away [Wed Sep 5 12:11:54 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 8711.710000, observed total counts = 6981.000000 [Wed Sep 5 12:11:54 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 16 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Wed Sep 5 12:11:54 2012] Source 16 is offset by 5.769947 and 7.906078 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.136920 x 1.136920, not incorporating fit results [Wed Sep 5 12:11:55 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Wed Sep 5 12:11:55 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Wed Sep 5 12:11:55 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Wed Sep 5 12:11:55 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Wed Sep 5 12:11:55 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Wed Sep 5 12:11:55 2012] Source is confused with source 15 [Wed Sep 5 12:12:42 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.94 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Wed Sep 5 12:12:42 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.94" [Wed Sep 5 12:12:42 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 31, mask sum = 22, frac = 0.709 [Wed Sep 5 12:12:42 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 13 for pass 1, mean size = 9.94" [Wed Sep 5 21:35:15 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0611181501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.ximg exists [Wed Sep 5 21:35:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0611181501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.csv [Wed Sep 5 21:35:15 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0611181501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13_1.ximg exists [Wed Sep 5 21:35:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0611181501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.csv [Wed Sep 5 21:35:15 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0611181501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0611181501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Sep 5 21:35:18 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0611181501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.ximg exists [Wed Sep 5 21:35:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0611181501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.csv [Wed Sep 5 21:35:18 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0611181501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg exists [Wed Sep 5 21:35:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0611181501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.csv [Wed Sep 5 21:35:18 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0611181501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0611181501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu Sep 6 05:22:01 2012] Warning: source 13 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 16 at 12.777046 pixels away [Thu Sep 6 05:22:01 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 7142.130000, observed total counts = 7189.000000 [Thu Sep 6 05:22:01 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 16 = 4.838813 pixels [Thu Sep 6 05:22:01 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 13 to 52 [Thu Sep 6 05:22:01 2012] 6656.780046 total counts/ 6656.780000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.000001 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 16 = 4.838813 pixels Position = (392.5, 336.0) = 5 34 6.02 22 2 2.7 Extent = 21.9" x 21.9", rotation angle = 348 Source counts = 0.0 +/- 81.6 Background counts = 6656.8 Rate = 2e-09 +/- 0.004 Deleting source due to low Poisson probability