[Tue Sep 4 23:57:18 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (292.3, 495.9) = 5 34 37.37 22 13 38.4 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 245.7 +/- 29.2 Background counts = 172.4 Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.002 [Tue Sep 4 23:57:19 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 14.32' [Wed Sep 5 00:01:41 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.59 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Wed Sep 5 00:01:41 2012] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass [Wed Sep 5 00:01:41 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.59" [Wed Sep 5 00:01:41 2012] source mask rpix=3.1, npix_max = 52, mask sum = 49, frac = 0.933 [Wed Sep 5 00:01:41 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 89 for pass 0, mean size = 13.59" [Wed Sep 5 05:33:25 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0611181501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89.ximg exists [Wed Sep 5 05:33:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0611181501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89.csv [Wed Sep 5 05:33:25 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0611181501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89_1.ximg exists [Wed Sep 5 05:33:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0611181501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89.csv [Wed Sep 5 05:33:25 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0611181501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0611181501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Sep 5 05:33:27 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0611181501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89.ximg exists [Wed Sep 5 05:33:27 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0611181501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89_1.ximg exists [Wed Sep 5 05:33:27 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0611181501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89 appears to have run properly [Wed Sep 5 12:11:55 2012] Warning, spatial fit 89 centroid is now closest to src. 103 [Wed Sep 5 12:11:55 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 3305.190000, observed total counts = 3299.000000 [Wed Sep 5 12:11:55 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 101 = 0.432876 pixels [Wed Sep 5 12:11:55 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 89 to 92 [Wed Sep 5 12:11:55 2012] 3164.055700 total counts/ 3140.150000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.426605 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 101 = 0.432876 pixels Position = (292.1, 495.5) = 5 34 37.42 22 13 36.4 Extent = 3.5" x 3.5", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 23.9 +/- 56.2 Background counts = 3140.2 Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.003 Deleting source due to low Poisson probability