[Sat Dec 17 02:02:21 2011] Detection parameters: Position = (282.4, 115.0) = 5 34 32.62 21 48 56.5 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 187.3 +/- 21.8 Background counts = 42.0 Rate = 0.04 +/- 0.004 [Sat Dec 17 02:02:24 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 13.35' [Sat Dec 17 05:59:51 2011] Using EEF radius (= 13.10 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sat Dec 17 05:59:51 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.10" [Sat Dec 17 05:59:51 2011] source mask rpix=3.0, npix_max = 49, mask sum = 56, frac = 1.135 [Sat Dec 17 05:59:51 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 52 for pass 0, mean size = 13.10" [Sat Dec 17 14:38:47 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0611181101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src52.ximg exists [Sat Dec 17 14:38:47 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0611181101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src52.csv [Sat Dec 17 14:38:47 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0611181101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src52_1.ximg exists [Sat Dec 17 14:38:47 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0611181101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src52.csv [Sat Dec 17 14:38:47 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0611181101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src52_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0611181101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src52.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sat Dec 17 14:38:49 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0611181101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src52.ximg exists [Sat Dec 17 14:38:49 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0611181101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src52_1.ximg exists [Sat Dec 17 14:38:49 2011] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0611181101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src52 appears to have run properly [Sat Dec 17 14:39:21 2011] Warning: source 16 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 27 at 10.112736 pixels away [Sat Dec 17 14:39:21 2011] Source 27 is offset by -7.528393 and -1.917912 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.553444 x 1.553444, not incorporating fit results [Sat Dec 17 14:39:21 2011] Warning, spatial fit 52 centroid is now closest to src. 4 [Sat Dec 17 14:39:21 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sat Dec 17 14:39:21 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sat Dec 17 14:39:21 2011] Assessing source extent using major [Sat Dec 17 14:39:21 2011] Source does appear to be extended [Sat Dec 17 14:39:21 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sat Dec 17 14:39:22 2011] Source is confused with source 4 [Sat Dec 17 18:23:03 2011] Using EEF radius (= 13.10 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sat Dec 17 18:23:03 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.10" [Sat Dec 17 18:23:03 2011] source mask rpix=3.0, npix_max = 49, mask sum = 56, frac = 1.135 [Sat Dec 17 18:23:03 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 45 for pass 1, mean size = 13.10" [Sun Dec 18 04:47:23 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0611181101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src45.ximg exists [Sun Dec 18 04:47:23 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0611181101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src45.csv [Sun Dec 18 04:47:23 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0611181101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src45_1.ximg exists [Sun Dec 18 04:47:23 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0611181101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src45.csv [Sun Dec 18 04:47:23 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0611181101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src45_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0611181101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src45.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Dec 18 04:47:25 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0611181101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src45.ximg exists [Sun Dec 18 04:47:25 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0611181101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src45_1.ximg exists [Sun Dec 18 04:47:25 2011] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0611181101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src45 appears to have run properly [Sun Dec 18 04:48:07 2011] Source 27 is offset by -7.528393 and -1.917912 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.553444 x 1.553444, not incorporating fit results [Sun Dec 18 04:48:07 2011] Warning: source 42 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 27 at 11.388945 pixels away [Sun Dec 18 04:48:07 2011] Warning, spatial fit 45 centroid is now closest to src. 4 [Sun Dec 18 04:48:08 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 1200.770000, observed total counts = 1196.000000 [Sun Dec 18 04:48:08 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 27 = 1.668518 pixels [Sun Dec 18 04:48:08 2011] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 45 to 71 [Sun Dec 18 04:48:08 2011] 1230.326200 total counts/ 1217.280000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.373929 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 27 = 1.668518 pixels Position = (280.8, 115.5) = 5 34 33.11 21 48 59.2 Extent = 3.5 (3.4-3.6)", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 13.0 +/- 35.1 Background counts = 1217.3 Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.007 Deleting source due to low Poisson probability