[Mon Mar 26 20:18:04 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (397.4, 373.9) = 5 34 5.44 22 4 59.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 72.8 +/- 17.4
  Background counts = 116.0
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.005

[Mon Mar 26 20:18:07 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 9.02'
[Tue Mar 27 05:17:27 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.94 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Mar 27 05:17:27 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.94"
[Tue Mar 27 05:17:27 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 36, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.990
[Tue Mar 27 05:17:27 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 87 for pass 0, mean size = 10.94"
[Tue Mar 27 16:18:09 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src87.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 27 16:18:09 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src87.csv
[Tue Mar 27 16:18:09 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src87_1.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 27 16:18:09 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src87.csv
[Tue Mar 27 16:18:09 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src87_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src87.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Mar 27 16:18:12 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src87.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 27 16:18:12 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src87.csv
[Tue Mar 27 16:18:12 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src87_1.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 27 16:18:12 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src87.csv
[Tue Mar 27 16:18:12 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src87_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src87.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Mar 27 16:19:17 2012] Warning, spatial fit 87 centroid is now closest to src. 53
[Tue Mar 27 16:19:17 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Mar 27 16:19:17 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Mar 27 16:19:17 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Mar 27 16:19:17 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Mar 27 16:19:17 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Mar 27 16:19:17 2012] Source is confused with source 52
[Wed Mar 28 00:11:55 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.94 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Mar 28 00:11:55 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.94"
[Wed Mar 28 00:11:55 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 36, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.990
[Wed Mar 28 00:11:55 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 76 for pass 1, mean size = 10.94"
[Wed Mar 28 11:27:08 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src76.ximg exists
[Wed Mar 28 11:27:08 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src76.csv
[Wed Mar 28 11:27:08 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src76_1.ximg exists
[Wed Mar 28 11:27:08 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src76.csv
[Wed Mar 28 11:27:08 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src76_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src76.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Mar 28 11:27:11 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src76.ximg exists
[Wed Mar 28 11:27:11 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src76.csv
[Wed Mar 28 11:27:11 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src76_1.ximg exists
[Wed Mar 28 11:27:11 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src76.csv
[Wed Mar 28 11:27:11 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src76_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src76.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Mar 28 11:28:14 2012] Warning: source 42 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 50 at 13.624440 pixels away
[Wed Mar 28 11:28:14 2012] Source 50 is offset by 7.144219 and -5.896491 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.349453 x 1.349453, not incorporating fit results
[Wed Mar 28 11:28:14 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Mar 28 11:28:14 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Mar 28 11:28:14 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Mar 28 11:28:14 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Mar 28 11:28:14 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Mar 28 11:28:14 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9