[Mon Mar 26 20:18:04 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (350.5, 393.6) = 5 34 20.10 22 6 17.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 73.7 +/- 21.8
  Background counts = 112.4
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.003

[Mon Mar 26 20:18:07 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.86'
[Tue Mar 27 05:17:27 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.36 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Mar 27 05:17:27 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.36"
[Tue Mar 27 05:17:27 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 33, mask sum = 24, frac = 0.722
[Tue Mar 27 05:17:27 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 94 for pass 0, mean size = 10.36"
[Tue Mar 27 16:18:09 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src94.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 27 16:18:09 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src94.csv
[Tue Mar 27 16:18:09 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src94_1.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 27 16:18:09 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src94.csv
[Tue Mar 27 16:18:09 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src94_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src94.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Mar 27 16:18:13 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src94.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 27 16:18:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src94.csv
[Tue Mar 27 16:18:13 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src94_1.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 27 16:18:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src94.csv
[Tue Mar 27 16:18:13 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src94_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src94.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Mar 27 16:19:17 2012] Warning, spatial fit 94 centroid is now closest to src. 44
[Tue Mar 27 16:19:17 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Mar 27 16:19:17 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Mar 27 16:19:17 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Mar 27 16:19:17 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Mar 27 16:19:17 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Mar 27 16:19:17 2012] Source is confused with source 23
[Wed Mar 28 00:11:55 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.36 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Mar 28 00:11:55 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.36"
[Wed Mar 28 00:11:55 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 33, mask sum = 24, frac = 0.722
[Wed Mar 28 00:11:55 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 82 for pass 1, mean size = 10.36"
[Wed Mar 28 11:27:08 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src82.ximg exists
[Wed Mar 28 11:27:08 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src82.csv
[Wed Mar 28 11:27:08 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src82_1.ximg exists
[Wed Mar 28 11:27:08 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src82.csv
[Wed Mar 28 11:27:08 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src82_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src82.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Mar 28 11:27:11 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src82.ximg exists
[Wed Mar 28 11:27:11 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src82.csv
[Wed Mar 28 11:27:11 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src82_1.ximg exists
[Wed Mar 28 11:27:11 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src82.csv
[Wed Mar 28 11:27:11 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src82_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src82.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Mar 28 11:27:40 2012] Warning, spatial fit 49 centroid is now closest to src. 56
[Wed Mar 28 11:27:40 2012] Warning, spatial fit 56 centroid is now closest to src. 48
[Wed Mar 28 11:27:40 2012] Warning, spatial fit 60 centroid is now closest to src. 68
[Wed Mar 28 11:27:40 2012] Warning, spatial fit 69 centroid is now closest to src. 62
[Wed Mar 28 11:28:14 2012] Source 49 is offset by 1.010573 and 9.072768 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.185048 x 1.185048, not incorporating fit results
[Wed Mar 28 11:28:14 2012] Warning, spatial fit 20 centroid is now closest to src. 38
[Wed Mar 28 11:28:14 2012] Warning, spatial fit 31 centroid is now closest to src. 13
[Wed Mar 28 11:28:14 2012] Warning, spatial fit 39 centroid is now closest to src. 91
[Wed Mar 28 11:28:14 2012] Warning, spatial fit 74 centroid is now closest to src. 60
[Wed Mar 28 11:28:14 2012] Warning, spatial fit 82 centroid is now closest to src. 44
[Wed Mar 28 11:28:14 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Mar 28 11:28:14 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Mar 28 11:28:14 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Mar 28 11:28:14 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Mar 28 11:28:14 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Mar 28 11:28:14 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9