[Mon Mar 26 20:16:17 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (312.3, 394.9) = 5 34 32.08 22 6 28.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 253.0 +/- 28.8
  Background counts = 236.8
  Rate = 0.06 +/- 0.006

[Mon Mar 26 20:16:20 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.06'
[Mon Mar 26 20:21:45 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.96 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Mar 26 20:21:45 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.96"
[Mon Mar 26 20:21:45 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 31, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.156
[Mon Mar 26 20:21:45 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 9.96"
[Tue Mar 27 05:17:22 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 27 05:17:22 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Tue Mar 27 05:17:22 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 27 05:17:22 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Tue Mar 27 05:17:22 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Mar 27 05:17:24 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 27 05:17:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Tue Mar 27 05:17:24 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 27 05:17:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Tue Mar 27 05:17:24 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Mar 27 16:18:47 2012] Source 9 is offset by 4.154754 and 9.016022 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.140524 x 1.140524, not incorporating fit results
[Tue Mar 27 16:18:47 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 4365.010000, observed total counts = 3308.000000
[Tue Mar 27 16:18:47 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 9
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue Mar 27 16:18:48 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Mar 27 16:18:48 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Mar 27 16:18:48 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Mar 27 16:18:48 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Mar 27 16:18:48 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Mar 27 16:19:47 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.96 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Mar 27 16:19:47 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.96"
[Tue Mar 27 16:19:47 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 31, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.156
[Tue Mar 27 16:19:47 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 7 for pass 1, mean size = 9.96"
[Wed Mar 28 00:11:51 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.ximg exists
[Wed Mar 28 00:11:51 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.csv
[Wed Mar 28 00:11:51 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7_1.ximg exists
[Wed Mar 28 00:11:51 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.csv
[Wed Mar 28 00:11:51 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Mar 28 00:11:53 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7.ximg exists
[Wed Mar 28 00:11:53 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7.csv
[Wed Mar 28 00:11:53 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7_1.ximg exists
[Wed Mar 28 00:11:53 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7.csv
[Wed Mar 28 00:11:53 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Mar 28 11:27:39 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 4261.860000, observed total counts = 3308.000000
[Wed Mar 28 11:27:39 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 9
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Wed Mar 28 11:27:40 2012] Source 9 is offset by 1.116180 and 7.054597 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.145347 x 1.145347, not incorporating fit results
[Wed Mar 28 11:27:40 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Mar 28 11:27:40 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Mar 28 11:27:40 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Mar 28 11:27:40 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Mar 28 11:27:40 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Mar 28 11:27:40 2012] Source is confused with source 5
[Wed Mar 28 11:28:39 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(27119.769623, 34307.087921, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Wed Mar 28 11:28:39 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9_src.reg
[Wed Mar 28 11:28:39 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (275, 357) - (350, 432)
[Wed Mar 28 11:28:39 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(27119.769623, 34307.087921, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28871.334930, 34120.545563, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27856.968000, 34322.734000, 1996.912057, 1996.912057, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28309.913055, 34312.533386, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25993.054840, 34300.721161, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28479.663000, 34992.688800, 998.456029, 998.456029, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28930.414642, 34546.335266, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(32225.270000, 34086.408000, 3097.744089, 3097.744089, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27752.654000, 36697.918000, 1791.832052, 1791.832052, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27913.511871, 35528.518219, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26269.005310, 34394.433075, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27805.098800, 36976.164000, 1228.056035, 1228.056035, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(30652.765800, 34806.092000, 2068.416060, 592.655217, 269.902400, X, Y)
[Wed Mar 28 11:28:39 2012] Writing fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9.gif
[Wed Mar 28 11:32:24 2012] Mean detx,y = (7107.76, -521.58) 
[Wed Mar 28 11:32:26 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Wed Mar 28 11:32:43 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Wed Mar 28 11:32:44 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9_src_b10.pi.gz
[Wed Mar 28 11:32:44 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9_bgd.pi.gz
[Wed Mar 28 12:21:39 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done
[Wed Mar 28 12:21:39 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Wed Mar 28 16:37:27 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Wed Mar 28 16:37:27 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9_src_b10.pi.gz
[Wed Mar 28 16:37:30 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Wed Mar 28 16:37:30 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.0569, arf fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9.arf
[Wed Mar 28 16:37:30 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Wed Mar 28 16:37:30 2012] Updating source flux to 9.4e-13
[Wed Mar 28 16:37:47 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting