[Mon Mar 26 20:16:19 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (399.9, 375.0) = 5 34 4.66 22 5 1.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 157.6 +/- 23.0
  Background counts = 129.7
  Rate = 0.04 +/- 0.005

[Mon Mar 26 20:16:20 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 9.22'
[Mon Mar 26 20:21:45 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.04 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Mar 26 20:21:45 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.04"
[Mon Mar 26 20:21:45 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 36, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.976
[Mon Mar 26 20:21:45 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 57 for pass 0, mean size = 11.04"
[Tue Mar 27 05:17:23 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src57.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 27 05:17:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src57.csv
[Tue Mar 27 05:17:23 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src57_1.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 27 05:17:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src57.csv
[Tue Mar 27 05:17:23 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src57_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src57.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Mar 27 05:17:26 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src57.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 27 05:17:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src57.csv
[Tue Mar 27 05:17:26 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src57_1.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 27 05:17:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src57.csv
[Tue Mar 27 05:17:26 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src57_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src57.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Mar 27 16:18:48 2012] Warning, spatial fit 57 centroid is now closest to src. 72
[Tue Mar 27 16:18:48 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Mar 27 16:18:48 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Mar 27 16:18:48 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Mar 27 16:18:48 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Mar 27 16:18:48 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Mar 27 16:18:48 2012] Source is confused with source 12
[Tue Mar 27 16:19:47 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.04 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Mar 27 16:19:47 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.04"
[Tue Mar 27 16:19:47 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 36, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.976
[Tue Mar 27 16:19:47 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 49 for pass 1, mean size = 11.04"
[Wed Mar 28 00:11:52 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src49.ximg exists
[Wed Mar 28 00:11:52 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src49_1.ximg exists
[Wed Mar 28 00:11:52 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src49 appears to have run properly
[Wed Mar 28 00:11:54 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src49.ximg exists
[Wed Mar 28 00:11:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src49.csv
[Wed Mar 28 00:11:54 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src49_1.ximg exists
[Wed Mar 28 00:11:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src49.csv
[Wed Mar 28 00:11:54 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src49_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src49.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Mar 28 11:27:40 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1839.030000, observed total counts = 1867.000000
[Wed Mar 28 11:27:40 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 57 = 0.715908 pixels
[Wed Mar 28 11:27:40 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 49 to 28
[Wed Mar 28 11:27:40 2012] 1779.474000 total counts/ 1663.500000 bgd. counts: snr = 2.843474
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 57 = 0.715908 pixels
  Position = (400.6, 374.8) = 5 34 4.45 22 4 59.6
  Extent = 10.8 (4.0-18.2)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 116.0 +/- 42.2
  Background counts = 1663.5
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.007
[Wed Mar 28 11:27:40 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1650.740000, observed total counts = 1691.000000
[Wed Mar 28 11:27:40 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 57 = 0.689351 pixels
[Wed Mar 28 11:27:40 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 28 to 48
[Wed Mar 28 11:27:40 2012] 1546.598400 total counts/ 1490.330000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.457550
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 57 = 0.689351 pixels
  Position = (401.2, 374.5) = 5 34 4.25 22 4 58.6
  Extent = 10.9 (5.0-20.4)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 56.3 +/- 39.3
  Background counts = 1490.3
  Rate = 0.009 +/- 0.006
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability