[Mon Mar 26 20:16:18 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (387.9, 236.9) = 5 34 8.43 21 54 58.6 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 115.9 +/- 16.4 Background counts = 107.2 Rate = 0.04 +/- 0.005 [Mon Mar 26 20:16:20 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.87' [Mon Mar 26 20:21:45 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.37 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon Mar 26 20:21:45 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.37" [Mon Mar 26 20:21:45 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 33, mask sum = 18, frac = 0.541 [Mon Mar 26 20:21:45 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 51 for pass 0, mean size = 10.37" [Tue Mar 27 05:17:23 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src51.ximg exists [Tue Mar 27 05:17:23 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src51_1.ximg exists [Tue Mar 27 05:17:23 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src51 appears to have run properly [Tue Mar 27 05:17:26 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src51.ximg exists [Tue Mar 27 05:17:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src51.csv [Tue Mar 27 05:17:26 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src51_1.ximg exists [Tue Mar 27 05:17:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src51.csv [Tue Mar 27 05:17:26 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src51_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src51.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Mar 27 16:18:48 2012] Warning: source 51 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 51 at 15.427993 pixels away [Tue Mar 27 16:18:48 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1712.000000, observed total counts = 1409.000000 [Tue Mar 27 16:18:48 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 51 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Tue Mar 27 16:18:48 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue Mar 27 16:18:48 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue Mar 27 16:18:48 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Tue Mar 27 16:18:48 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Tue Mar 27 16:18:48 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue Mar 27 16:19:47 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.37 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue Mar 27 16:19:47 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.37" [Tue Mar 27 16:19:47 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 33, mask sum = 18, frac = 0.541 [Tue Mar 27 16:19:47 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 43 for pass 1, mean size = 10.37" [Wed Mar 28 00:11:52 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src43.ximg exists [Wed Mar 28 00:11:52 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src43.csv [Wed Mar 28 00:11:52 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src43_1.ximg exists [Wed Mar 28 00:11:52 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src43.csv [Wed Mar 28 00:11:52 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src43_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src43.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Mar 28 00:11:54 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src43.ximg exists [Wed Mar 28 00:11:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src43.csv [Wed Mar 28 00:11:54 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src43_1.ximg exists [Wed Mar 28 00:11:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src43.csv [Wed Mar 28 00:11:54 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src43_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src43.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Mar 28 11:27:40 2012] Warning, spatial fit 43 centroid is now closest to src. 80 [Wed Mar 28 11:27:40 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Wed Mar 28 11:27:40 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Wed Mar 28 11:27:40 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Wed Mar 28 11:27:40 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Wed Mar 28 11:27:40 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Wed Mar 28 11:28:42 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(33702.155426, 20564.843460, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Wed Mar 28 11:28:42 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src51_src.reg [Wed Mar 28 11:28:42 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (350, 199) - (425, 274) [Wed Mar 28 11:28:42 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(33702.155426, 20564.843460, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34270.408000, 23591.064000, 1191.968034, 1191.968034, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(33838.000000, 22489.786163, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(33980.317535, 23185.666687, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34645.543091, 22917.094543, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34632.368835, 22499.192932, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34140.198090, 21189.246613, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(35403.866000, 22462.872800, 1065.760031, 1065.760031, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(33592.306244, 19530.337845, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Wed Mar 28 11:28:42 2012] Writing fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src51.gif [Wed Mar 28 12:03:41 2012] Mean detx,y = (-6369.52, 6858.68) [Wed Mar 28 12:03:44 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum [Wed Mar 28 12:04:05 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin [Wed Mar 28 12:04:06 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src51_src_b10.pi.gz [Wed Mar 28 12:04:06 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src51_bgd.pi.gz [Wed Mar 28 13:14:33 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done [Wed Mar 28 13:14:33 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts [Wed Mar 28 16:37:28 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products [Wed Mar 28 16:37:28 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src51_src_b10.pi.gz [Wed Mar 28 16:37:32 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00 [Wed Mar 28 16:37:32 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.035, arf fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src51.arf [Wed Mar 28 16:37:32 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass [Wed Mar 28 16:37:32 2012] Updating source flux to 7.7e-13 [Wed Mar 28 16:37:47 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting