[Mon Mar 26 20:16:17 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (394.2, 371.9) = 5 34 6.45 22 4 47.5 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 189.0 +/- 20.6 Background counts = 136.4 Rate = 0.05 +/- 0.006 [Mon Mar 26 20:16:20 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.75' [Mon Mar 26 20:21:45 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.80 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon Mar 26 20:21:45 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.80" [Mon Mar 26 20:21:45 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 35, mask sum = 18, frac = 0.506 [Mon Mar 26 20:21:45 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 12 for pass 0, mean size = 10.80" [Tue Mar 27 05:17:22 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.ximg exists [Tue Mar 27 05:17:22 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.csv [Tue Mar 27 05:17:22 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12_1.ximg exists [Tue Mar 27 05:17:22 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.csv [Tue Mar 27 05:17:22 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Mar 27 05:17:24 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.ximg exists [Tue Mar 27 05:17:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.csv [Tue Mar 27 05:17:24 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg exists [Tue Mar 27 05:17:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.csv [Tue Mar 27 05:17:24 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Mar 27 16:18:47 2012] Warning, spatial fit 12 centroid is now closest to src. 56 [Tue Mar 27 16:18:48 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue Mar 27 16:18:48 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue Mar 27 16:18:48 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Tue Mar 27 16:18:48 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Tue Mar 27 16:18:48 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue Mar 27 16:18:48 2012] Source is confused with source 34 [Tue Mar 27 16:18:48 2012] Source is confused with source 57 [Tue Mar 27 16:19:47 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.80 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue Mar 27 16:19:47 2012] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass [Tue Mar 27 16:19:47 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.80" [Tue Mar 27 16:19:47 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 35, mask sum = 18, frac = 0.506 [Tue Mar 27 16:19:47 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 10 for pass 1, mean size = 10.80" [Wed Mar 28 00:11:51 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.ximg exists [Wed Mar 28 00:11:51 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.csv [Wed Mar 28 00:11:51 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10_1.ximg exists [Wed Mar 28 00:11:51 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.csv [Wed Mar 28 00:11:51 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Mar 28 00:11:53 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.ximg exists [Wed Mar 28 00:11:53 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.csv [Wed Mar 28 00:11:53 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg exists [Wed Mar 28 00:11:53 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.csv [Wed Mar 28 00:11:53 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Mar 28 11:27:39 2012] Warning, spatial fit 10 centroid is now closest to src. 32 [Wed Mar 28 11:27:40 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Wed Mar 28 11:27:40 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Wed Mar 28 11:27:40 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Wed Mar 28 11:27:40 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Wed Mar 28 11:27:40 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Wed Mar 28 11:28:39 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(34244.532776, 32302.593903, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Wed Mar 28 11:28:39 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src12_src.reg [Wed Mar 28 11:28:39 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (357, 334) - (432, 409) [Wed Mar 28 11:28:39 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(34244.532776, 32302.593903, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(31435.896759, 34045.365753, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34161.175476, 30665.622314, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34338.085388, 29706.299164, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(32225.270000, 34086.408000, 3097.744089, 3097.744089, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(35318.656738, 32829.057007, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34441.541260, 31703.236969, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34353.975739, 30129.848022, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(32746.995361, 34834.780304, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(33729.565948, 34619.348572, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(33365.967651, 34487.045807, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34685.700409, 33450.450684, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(35634.472000, 33433.702000, 1765.944051, 1765.944051, -0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34439.411926, 31184.446899, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(32002.801270, 35213.777771, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(33174.082000, 35056.617400, 1777.568051, 1777.568051, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(30652.765800, 34806.092000, 2068.416060, 592.655217, 269.902400, X, Y) && !ellipse(34937.211334, 32145.410858, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(35007.033295, 31012.844391, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(35980.972382, 29337.016449, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Wed Mar 28 11:28:39 2012] Writing fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src12.gif [Wed Mar 28 11:33:44 2012] Mean detx,y = (5344.27, 6854.29) [Wed Mar 28 11:33:46 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum [Wed Mar 28 11:34:03 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin [Wed Mar 28 11:34:03 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src12_src_b10.pi.gz [Wed Mar 28 11:34:03 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src12_bgd.pi.gz [Wed Mar 28 12:22:33 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done [Wed Mar 28 12:22:33 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts [Wed Mar 28 16:37:27 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products [Wed Mar 28 16:37:27 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src12_src_b10.pi.gz [Wed Mar 28 16:37:30 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00 [Wed Mar 28 16:37:30 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.055, arf fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180701_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src12.arf [Wed Mar 28 16:37:30 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass [Wed Mar 28 16:37:30 2012] Updating source flux to 1.1e-12 [Wed Mar 28 16:37:47 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting