[Thu Feb 23 09:58:59 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (393.2, 271.0) = 5 34 6.95 21 57 34.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 155.3 +/- 29.3
  Background counts = 343.9
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.004

[Thu Feb 23 09:59:00 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.16'
[Thu Feb 23 22:40:57 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.01 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Feb 23 22:40:57 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.01"
[Thu Feb 23 22:40:57 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 31, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.148
[Thu Feb 23 22:40:57 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 83 for pass 0, mean size = 10.01"
[Fri Feb 24 09:35:57 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src83.ximg exists
[Fri Feb 24 09:35:57 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src83.csv
[Fri Feb 24 09:35:57 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src83_1.ximg exists
[Fri Feb 24 09:35:57 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src83.csv
[Fri Feb 24 09:35:57 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src83_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src83.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Feb 24 09:36:01 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src83.ximg exists
[Fri Feb 24 09:36:01 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src83_1.ximg exists
[Fri Feb 24 09:36:01 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src83 appears to have run properly
[Fri Feb 24 09:37:14 2012] Warning, spatial fit 83 centroid is now closest to src. 88
[Fri Feb 24 09:37:15 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Feb 24 09:37:15 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Feb 24 09:37:15 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Feb 24 09:37:15 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Feb 24 09:37:15 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Feb 24 09:37:15 2012] Source is confused with source 91
[Sat Feb 25 05:51:24 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.01 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Feb 25 05:51:24 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.01"
[Sat Feb 25 05:51:24 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 31, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.148
[Sat Feb 25 05:51:24 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 75 for pass 1, mean size = 10.01"
[Sat Feb 25 22:23:52 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src75.ximg exists
[Sat Feb 25 22:23:52 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src75.csv
[Sat Feb 25 22:23:52 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src75_1.ximg exists
[Sat Feb 25 22:23:52 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src75.csv
[Sat Feb 25 22:23:52 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src75_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src75.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Feb 25 22:23:55 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src75.ximg exists
[Sat Feb 25 22:23:55 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src75_1.ximg exists
[Sat Feb 25 22:23:55 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0611180101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src75 appears to have run properly
[Sat Feb 25 22:25:13 2012] Source 90 is offset by -4.900974 and -4.169651 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.143471 x 1.143471, not incorporating fit results
[Sat Feb 25 22:25:13 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 3247.910000, observed total counts = 3315.000000
[Sat Feb 25 22:25:13 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 90 = 6.911338 pixels
[Sat Feb 25 22:25:13 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 75 to 65
[Sat Feb 25 22:25:13 2012] 3218.800021 total counts/ 3218.800000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.000000
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 90 = 6.911338 pixels
  Position = (400.1, 269.9) = 5 34 4.82 21 57 27.3
  Extent = 19.7 (19.7-39.5)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 0.0 +/- 56.7
  Background counts = 3218.8
  Rate = 2e-09 +/- 0.006
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability