[Thu Feb 23 09:58:44 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (398.3, 407.9) = 5 34 5.34 22 7 27.9 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 113.1 +/- 20.8 Background counts = 155.9 Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.004 [Thu Feb 23 09:58:48 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.74' [Thu Feb 23 10:02:32 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.80 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Thu Feb 23 10:02:32 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.80" [Thu Feb 23 10:02:32 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 41, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.727 [Thu Feb 23 10:02:32 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 92 for pass 0, mean size = 11.80" [Thu Feb 23 22:40:54 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src92.ximg exists [Thu Feb 23 22:40:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src92.csv [Thu Feb 23 22:40:54 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src92_1.ximg exists [Thu Feb 23 22:40:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src92.csv [Thu Feb 23 22:40:54 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src92_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src92.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu Feb 23 22:40:57 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src92.ximg exists [Thu Feb 23 22:40:57 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src92_1.ximg exists [Thu Feb 23 22:40:57 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src92 appears to have run properly [Fri Feb 24 09:36:39 2012] Source 97 is offset by 4.863884 and -6.492958 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.302014 x 1.302014, not incorporating fit results [Fri Feb 24 09:36:40 2012] Warning, spatial fit 92 centroid is now closest to src. 102 [Fri Feb 24 09:36:40 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Fri Feb 24 09:36:40 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Fri Feb 24 09:36:40 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Fri Feb 24 09:36:40 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Fri Feb 24 09:36:40 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Fri Feb 24 09:37:41 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.80 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Fri Feb 24 09:37:41 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.80" [Fri Feb 24 09:37:41 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 41, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.727 [Fri Feb 24 09:37:41 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 79 for pass 1, mean size = 11.80" [Sat Feb 25 05:51:21 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src79.ximg exists [Sat Feb 25 05:51:21 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src79.csv [Sat Feb 25 05:51:21 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src79_1.ximg exists [Sat Feb 25 05:51:21 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src79.csv [Sat Feb 25 05:51:21 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src79_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src79.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sat Feb 25 05:51:24 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src79.ximg exists [Sat Feb 25 05:51:24 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src79_1.ximg exists [Sat Feb 25 05:51:24 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src79 appears to have run properly [Sat Feb 25 22:24:40 2012] Source 97 is offset by 5.195079 and 5.838237 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.260616 x 1.260616, not incorporating fit results [Sat Feb 25 22:24:41 2012] Warning, spatial fit 79 centroid is now closest to src. 52 [Sat Feb 25 22:24:41 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sat Feb 25 22:24:41 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sat Feb 25 22:24:41 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Sat Feb 25 22:24:41 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Sat Feb 25 22:24:41 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sat Feb 25 22:25:55 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(34601.859894, 35440.814636, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Sat Feb 25 22:25:55 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src97_src.reg [Sat Feb 25 22:25:55 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180101_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (361, 370) - (436, 445) [Sat Feb 25 22:25:55 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(34601.859894, 35440.814636, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(33406.998000, 34198.612000, 1145.480033, 1145.480033, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(33633.506000, 35153.828000, 708.020020, 708.020020, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(32843.818700, 35234.369600, 522.436015, 522.436015, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(32034.652000, 35005.178000, 1677.376048, 1677.376048, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(33141.997345, 34564.562042, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(33984.344000, 34194.200000, 977.408028, 977.408028, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(32386.148000, 34026.936000, 1353.304039, 1353.304039, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(32670.692474, 34067.115753, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34500.384674, 33090.457916, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34468.493800, 32669.604000, 1133.072033, 1133.072033, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(35047.292920, 37038.754000, 1967.792057, 1967.792057, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(32053.661011, 35436.335602, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(35741.475464, 33953.453949, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34750.968994, 33786.423401, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(35220.502960, 33637.332886, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34983.090240, 32757.044647, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Sat Feb 25 22:25:55 2012] Writing fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src97.gif [Sun Feb 26 00:31:55 2012] Mean detx,y = (8507.51, 6926.97) [Sun Feb 26 00:31:57 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum [Sun Feb 26 00:32:21 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin [Sun Feb 26 00:32:22 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src97_src_b10.pi.gz [Sun Feb 26 00:32:22 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src97_bgd.pi.gz [Sun Feb 26 04:22:24 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done [Sun Feb 26 04:22:24 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts [Sun Feb 26 11:31:41 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products [Sun Feb 26 11:31:41 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src97_src_b10.pi.gz [Sun Feb 26 11:31:46 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00 [Sun Feb 26 11:31:46 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.0214, arf fullrun_mos1_xmm0611180101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src97.arf [Sun Feb 26 11:31:46 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass [Sun Feb 26 11:31:46 2012] Updating source flux to 4.4e-13 [Sun Feb 26 11:32:03 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting