[Sat May 5 10:34:31 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (149.7, 321.4) = 17 56 8.90 -33 11 55.9 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 164.2 +/- 23.6 Background counts = 174.0 Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0004 [Sat May 5 10:34:33 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.91' [Sat May 5 10:42:58 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.89 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sat May 5 10:42:58 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.89" [Sat May 5 10:42:58 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 41, mask sum = 49, frac = 1.173 [Sat May 5 10:42:58 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 23 for pass 0, mean size = 11.89" [Sat May 5 12:57:16 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0604980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg exists [Sat May 5 12:57:17 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0604980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.csv [Sat May 5 12:57:17 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0604980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg exists [Sat May 5 12:57:17 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0604980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.csv [Sat May 5 12:57:17 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0604980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0604980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sat May 5 12:57:17 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0604980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.ximg exists [Sat May 5 12:57:17 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0604980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.csv [Sat May 5 12:57:17 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0604980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg exists [Sat May 5 12:57:17 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0604980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.csv [Sat May 5 12:57:17 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0604980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0604980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sat May 5 15:01:28 2012] Source 24 is offset by -3.072802 and -2.817929 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.406331 x 1.406331, not incorporating fit results [Sat May 5 15:01:28 2012] Warning, spatial fit 23 centroid is now closest to src. 26 [Sat May 5 15:01:28 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sat May 5 15:01:28 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sat May 5 15:01:28 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Sat May 5 15:01:28 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Sat May 5 15:01:28 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sat May 5 15:02:00 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.89 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sat May 5 15:02:00 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.89" [Sat May 5 15:02:00 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 41, mask sum = 49, frac = 1.173 [Sat May 5 15:02:00 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 22 for pass 1, mean size = 11.89" [Sat May 5 16:49:08 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0604980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22.ximg exists [Sat May 5 16:49:08 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0604980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22.csv [Sat May 5 16:49:08 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0604980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22_1.ximg exists [Sat May 5 16:49:08 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0604980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22.csv [Sat May 5 16:49:08 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0604980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0604980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sat May 5 16:49:08 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0604980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22.ximg exists [Sat May 5 16:49:08 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0604980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22.csv [Sat May 5 16:49:08 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0604980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22_1.ximg exists [Sat May 5 16:49:08 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0604980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22.csv [Sat May 5 16:49:08 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0604980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0604980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sat May 5 18:25:51 2012] Source 24 is offset by 0.418687 and -6.102274 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 2.717784 x 2.717784, not incorporating fit results [Sat May 5 18:25:51 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sat May 5 18:25:51 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sat May 5 18:25:51 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Sat May 5 18:25:51 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Sat May 5 18:25:51 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sat May 5 18:26:25 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(12973.472183, 27916.034149, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Sat May 5 18:26:25 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0604980201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src24_src.reg [Sat May 5 18:26:25 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0604980201_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (112, 284) - (187, 359) [Sat May 5 18:26:25 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(12973.472183, 27916.034149, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(12340.983139, 29067.321228, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(12172.868011, 27531.331024, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Sat May 5 18:26:25 2012] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0604980201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src24.gif [Sat May 5 19:12:04 2012] Mean detx,y = (12015.90, 2926.47) [Sat May 5 19:12:11 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum [Sat May 5 19:12:41 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin [Sat May 5 19:12:42 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0604980201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src24_src_b10.pi.gz [Sat May 5 19:12:42 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0604980201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src24_bgd.pi.gz [Sat May 5 19:43:50 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done [Sat May 5 19:43:50 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts [Sat May 5 21:15:35 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products [Sat May 5 21:15:35 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_pn_xmm0604980201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src24_src_b10.pi.gz [Sat May 5 21:15:38 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00 [Sat May 5 21:15:38 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00305, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0604980201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src24.arf [Sat May 5 21:15:38 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass [Sat May 5 21:15:38 2012] Updating source flux to 1.4e-14 [Sat May 5 21:18:05 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting