[Tue Jan 17 10:59:01 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (305.5, 452.3) = 3 32 26.96 -27 40 11.5 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 135.5 +/- 22.9 Background counts = 215.0 Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0002 [Tue Jan 17 10:59:04 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 11.17' [Tue Jan 17 11:06:00 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.01 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue Jan 17 11:06:00 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.01" [Tue Jan 17 11:06:00 2012] source mask rpix=2.8, npix_max = 42, mask sum = 26, frac = 0.611 [Tue Jan 17 11:06:00 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 10 for pass 0, mean size = 12.01" [Tue Jan 17 12:43:40 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0604960901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.ximg exists [Tue Jan 17 12:43:40 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0604960901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.csv [Tue Jan 17 12:43:40 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0604960901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10_1.ximg exists [Tue Jan 17 12:43:40 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0604960901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.csv [Tue Jan 17 12:43:40 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0604960901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0604960901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Jan 17 12:43:41 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0604960901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.ximg exists [Tue Jan 17 12:43:41 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0604960901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.csv [Tue Jan 17 12:43:41 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0604960901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg exists [Tue Jan 17 12:43:41 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0604960901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.csv [Tue Jan 17 12:43:41 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0604960901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0604960901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Jan 17 14:08:42 2012] Warning, spatial fit 10 centroid is now closest to src. 2 [Tue Jan 17 14:08:42 2012] Source 10 is offset by 7.545455 and -3.908153 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 5.633242 x 5.633242, not incorporating fit results [Tue Jan 17 14:08:42 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue Jan 17 14:08:42 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue Jan 17 14:08:42 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Tue Jan 17 14:08:42 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Tue Jan 17 14:08:42 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue Jan 17 14:08:42 2012] Source is confused with source 11 [Tue Jan 17 14:09:02 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.01 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue Jan 17 14:09:02 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.01" [Tue Jan 17 14:09:02 2012] source mask rpix=2.8, npix_max = 42, mask sum = 26, frac = 0.611 [Tue Jan 17 14:09:02 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 12.01" [Tue Jan 17 15:52:15 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0604960901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists [Tue Jan 17 15:52:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0604960901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv [Tue Jan 17 15:52:15 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0604960901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists [Tue Jan 17 15:52:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0604960901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv [Tue Jan 17 15:52:15 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0604960901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0604960901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Jan 17 15:52:15 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0604960901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists [Tue Jan 17 15:52:15 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0604960901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists [Tue Jan 17 15:52:15 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0604960901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly [Tue Jan 17 17:06:13 2012] Source 10 is offset by 7.378973 and -5.932590 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 6.857977 x 6.857977, not incorporating fit results [Tue Jan 17 17:06:13 2012] Source 10 is offset by 7.826076 and -4.023211 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 5.904920 x 5.904920, not incorporating fit results [Tue Jan 17 17:06:13 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue Jan 17 17:06:13 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue Jan 17 17:06:13 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Tue Jan 17 17:06:13 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Tue Jan 17 17:06:13 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue Jan 17 17:06:33 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(26530.010620, 39304.402649, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Tue Jan 17 17:06:33 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0604960901_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src10_src.reg [Tue Jan 17 17:06:33 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0604960901_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (268, 415) - (343, 490) [Tue Jan 17 17:06:33 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(26530.010620, 39304.402649, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26528.308746, 38329.943176, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24487.451447, 40543.534027, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26665.294983, 38924.829041, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27233.696930, 37922.818329, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Tue Jan 17 17:06:33 2012] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0604960901_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src10.gif [Tue Jan 17 17:21:47 2012] Mean detx,y = (-5822.88, -10895.29) [Tue Jan 17 17:21:53 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum [Tue Jan 17 17:22:27 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin [Tue Jan 17 17:22:27 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0604960901_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src10_src_b10.pi.gz [Tue Jan 17 17:22:27 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0604960901_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src10_bgd.pi.gz [Tue Jan 17 18:08:44 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done [Tue Jan 17 18:08:44 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts [Tue Jan 17 20:09:54 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products [Tue Jan 17 20:09:54 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_pn_xmm0604960901_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src10_src_b10.pi.gz [Tue Jan 17 20:09:55 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00 [Tue Jan 17 20:09:55 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00115, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0604960901_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src10.arf [Tue Jan 17 20:09:55 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass [Tue Jan 17 20:09:55 2012] Updating source flux to 6.5e-15 [Tue Jan 17 20:12:04 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting