[Sun Mar 18 06:54:03 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (261.6, 241.2) = 15 51 6.89 -54 21 0.5
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 82.1 +/- 16.1
  Background counts = 87.4
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0005

[Sun Mar 18 06:54:04 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.93'
[Sun Mar 18 06:57:06 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.90 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Mar 18 06:57:06 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.90"
[Sun Mar 18 06:57:06 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.965
[Sun Mar 18 06:57:06 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 27 for pass 0, mean size = 8.90"
[Sun Mar 18 08:32:36 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 18 08:32:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27.csv
[Sun Mar 18 08:32:36 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27_1.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 18 08:32:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27.csv
[Sun Mar 18 08:32:36 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Mar 18 08:32:36 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 18 08:32:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27.csv
[Sun Mar 18 08:32:36 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27_1.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 18 08:32:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27.csv
[Sun Mar 18 08:32:36 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Mar 18 10:53:13 2012] Warning: source 7 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 29 at 10.253546 pixels away
[Sun Mar 18 10:53:13 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1000.220000, observed total counts = 739.000000
[Sun Mar 18 10:53:13 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 29
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sun Mar 18 10:53:13 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Mar 18 10:53:13 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Mar 18 10:53:13 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Mar 18 10:53:13 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Mar 18 10:53:13 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Mar 18 10:53:47 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.90 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Mar 18 10:53:47 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.90"
[Sun Mar 18 10:53:47 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.965
[Sun Mar 18 10:53:47 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 25 for pass 1, mean size = 8.90"
[Sun Mar 18 12:14:24 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src25.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 18 12:14:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src25.csv
[Sun Mar 18 12:14:24 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src25_1.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 18 12:14:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src25.csv
[Sun Mar 18 12:14:24 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src25_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src25.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Mar 18 12:14:25 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src25.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 18 12:14:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src25.csv
[Sun Mar 18 12:14:25 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src25_1.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 18 12:14:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src25.csv
[Sun Mar 18 12:14:25 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src25_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src25.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Mar 18 14:27:38 2012] Warning: source 7 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 29 at 10.253546 pixels away
[Sun Mar 18 14:27:38 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 999.075000, observed total counts = 739.000000
[Sun Mar 18 14:27:38 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 29
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sun Mar 18 14:27:38 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Mar 18 14:27:38 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Mar 18 14:27:38 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Mar 18 14:27:38 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Mar 18 14:27:38 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Mar 18 14:27:38 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9