[Sun Mar 18 06:54:03 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (290.0, 304.8) = 15 50 52.74 -54 16 23.2
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 76.7 +/- 18.2
  Background counts = 92.1
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0005

[Sun Mar 18 06:54:04 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 0.77'
[Sun Mar 18 06:57:06 2012] Using EEF radius (= 6.81 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Mar 18 06:57:06 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 6.81"
[Sun Mar 18 06:57:06 2012] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 17, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.937
[Sun Mar 18 06:57:06 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 23 for pass 0, mean size = 6.81"
[Sun Mar 18 08:32:35 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 18 08:32:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.csv
[Sun Mar 18 08:32:36 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 18 08:32:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.csv
[Sun Mar 18 08:32:36 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Mar 18 08:32:36 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 18 08:32:36 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 18 08:32:36 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23 appears to have run properly
[Sun Mar 18 10:53:13 2012] Source 25 is offset by 2.593246 and -7.462933 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.981512 x 0.981512, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Mar 18 10:53:13 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Mar 18 10:53:13 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Mar 18 10:53:13 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Mar 18 10:53:13 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Mar 18 10:53:13 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Mar 18 10:53:47 2012] Using EEF radius (= 6.81 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Mar 18 10:53:47 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 6.81"
[Sun Mar 18 10:53:47 2012] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 17, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.937
[Sun Mar 18 10:53:47 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 22 for pass 1, mean size = 6.81"
[Sun Mar 18 12:14:24 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 18 12:14:24 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22_1.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 18 12:14:24 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22 appears to have run properly
[Sun Mar 18 12:14:25 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 18 12:14:25 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22_1.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 18 12:14:25 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22 appears to have run properly
[Sun Mar 18 14:27:38 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1356.140000, observed total counts = 1355.000000
[Sun Mar 18 14:27:38 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 25 = 0.679331 pixels
[Sun Mar 18 14:27:38 2012] 1316.655200 total counts/ 1279.920000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.026812
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 25 = 0.679331 pixels
  Position = (289.7, 305.4) = 15 50 52.89 -54 16 21.4
  Extent = 8.7 (4.1-13.6)", rotation angle = 85 (70-101) degrees
  Source counts = 36.7 +/- 36.3
  Background counts = 1279.9
  Rate = 0.0009 +/- 0.0009
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability