[Sun Mar 18 06:54:03 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (391.3, 188.4) = 15 50 2.28 -54 24 50.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 81.0 +/- 14.0
  Background counts = 53.6
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0003

[Sun Mar 18 06:54:04 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.44'
[Sun Mar 18 06:57:06 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.65 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Mar 18 06:57:06 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.65"
[Sun Mar 18 06:57:06 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 40, mask sum = 33, frac = 0.817
[Sun Mar 18 06:57:06 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 17 for pass 0, mean size = 11.65"
[Sun Mar 18 08:32:35 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 18 08:32:35 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.csv
[Sun Mar 18 08:32:35 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17_1.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 18 08:32:35 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.csv
[Sun Mar 18 08:32:35 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Mar 18 08:32:36 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 18 08:32:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.csv
[Sun Mar 18 08:32:36 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 18 08:32:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.csv
[Sun Mar 18 08:32:36 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Mar 18 10:53:13 2012] Warning: source 17 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 19 at 10.340640 pixels away
[Sun Mar 18 10:53:13 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Mar 18 10:53:13 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Mar 18 10:53:13 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Mar 18 10:53:13 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Mar 18 10:53:13 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Mar 18 10:53:47 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.65 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Mar 18 10:53:47 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.65"
[Sun Mar 18 10:53:47 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 40, mask sum = 33, frac = 0.817
[Sun Mar 18 10:53:47 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 17 for pass 1, mean size = 11.65"
[Sun Mar 18 12:14:24 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 18 12:14:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.csv
[Sun Mar 18 12:14:24 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17_1.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 18 12:14:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.csv
[Sun Mar 18 12:14:24 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Mar 18 12:14:25 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 18 12:14:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.csv
[Sun Mar 18 12:14:25 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 18 12:14:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.csv
[Sun Mar 18 12:14:25 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Mar 18 14:27:38 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 516.651000, observed total counts = 337.000000
[Sun Mar 18 14:27:38 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 19
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sun Mar 18 14:27:38 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Mar 18 14:27:38 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Mar 18 14:27:38 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Mar 18 14:27:38 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Mar 18 14:27:38 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Mar 18 14:27:38 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9