[Sun Mar 18 06:54:04 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (358.5, 372.9) = 15 50 18.78 -54 11 28.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 84.6 +/- 12.6
  Background counts = 20.2
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0003

[Sun Mar 18 06:54:05 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.93'
[Sun Mar 18 08:32:36 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.90 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Mar 18 08:32:36 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.90"
[Sun Mar 18 08:32:36 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 30, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.974
[Sun Mar 18 08:32:36 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 13 for pass 0, mean size = 9.90"
[Sun Mar 18 09:26:35 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 18 09:26:35 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.csv
[Sun Mar 18 09:26:35 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13_1.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 18 09:26:35 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.csv
[Sun Mar 18 09:26:35 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Mar 18 09:26:35 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 18 09:26:35 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.csv
[Sun Mar 18 09:26:35 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 18 09:26:35 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.csv
[Sun Mar 18 09:26:35 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Mar 18 10:53:21 2012] Source 7 is offset by -6.856664 and 4.086306 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.920386 x 0.920386, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Mar 18 10:53:21 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Mar 18 10:53:21 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Mar 18 10:53:21 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Mar 18 10:53:21 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Mar 18 10:53:21 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Mar 18 12:14:25 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.90 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Mar 18 12:14:25 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.90"
[Sun Mar 18 12:14:25 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 30, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.974
[Sun Mar 18 12:14:25 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 9.90"
[Sun Mar 18 12:35:33 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 18 12:35:33 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Sun Mar 18 12:35:33 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 18 12:35:33 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Sun Mar 18 12:35:33 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Mar 18 12:35:33 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 18 12:35:33 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Sun Mar 18 12:35:33 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 18 12:35:33 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Sun Mar 18 12:35:33 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Mar 18 14:27:42 2012] Source 7 is offset by -5.982756 and -6.734728 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.193582 x 1.193582, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Mar 18 14:27:42 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Mar 18 14:27:42 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Mar 18 14:27:42 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Mar 18 14:27:42 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Mar 18 14:27:42 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Mar 18 14:27:42 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.8