[Sun Mar 18 06:54:05 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (400.1, 182.2) = 15 49 57.90 -54 25 17.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 50.9 +/- 10.9
  Background counts = 20.1
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0002

[Sun Mar 18 06:54:05 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 11.19'
[Sun Mar 18 08:32:36 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.02 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Mar 18 08:32:36 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.02"
[Sun Mar 18 08:32:36 2012] source mask rpix=2.8, npix_max = 42, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.845
[Sun Mar 18 08:32:36 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 20 for pass 0, mean size = 12.02"
[Sun Mar 18 09:26:35 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 18 09:26:35 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20.csv
[Sun Mar 18 09:26:35 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20_1.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 18 09:26:35 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20.csv
[Sun Mar 18 09:26:35 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Mar 18 09:26:35 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 18 09:26:35 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20_1.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 18 09:26:35 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0604880101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20 appears to have run properly
[Sun Mar 18 10:53:21 2012] Source 11 is offset by -8.198924 and -2.034403 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.405090 x 1.405090, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Mar 18 10:53:21 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 270.417000, observed total counts = 271.000000
[Sun Mar 18 10:53:21 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 11 = 0.034294 pixels
[Sun Mar 18 10:53:21 2012] 272.708100 total counts/ 236.981000 bgd. counts: snr = 2.320818
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 11 = 0.034294 pixels
  Position = (400.1, 182.2) = 15 49 57.90 -54 25 16.7
  Extent = 5.9 (3.5-9.5)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 35.7 +/- 16.5
  Background counts = 237.0
  Rate = 0.0008 +/- 0.0004
[Sun Mar 18 10:53:21 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Mar 18 10:53:21 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Mar 18 10:53:21 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Sun Mar 18 10:53:21 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Mar 18 10:53:21 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Mar 18 10:53:21 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.8