[Wed Jun 12 12:53:18 2013] Detection parameters: Position = (350.0, 339.7) = 18 13 57.76 -32 45 50.0 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 77.4 +/- 15.5 Background counts = 73.0 Rate = 0.0008 +/- 0.0002 [Wed Jun 12 12:53:19 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.79' [Wed Jun 12 12:54:03 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.82 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Wed Jun 12 12:54:03 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.82" [Wed Jun 12 12:54:03 2013] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.978 [Wed Jun 12 12:54:03 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 43 for pass 0, mean size = 8.82" [Wed Jun 12 12:54:04 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0604860301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src43.ximg exists [Wed Jun 12 12:54:04 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0604860301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src43.csv [Wed Jun 12 12:54:04 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0604860301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src43_1.ximg exists [Wed Jun 12 12:54:04 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0604860301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src43.csv [Wed Jun 12 12:54:04 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0604860301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src43_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0604860301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src43.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Jun 12 12:54:05 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0604860301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src43.ximg exists [Wed Jun 12 12:54:05 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0604860301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src43.csv [Wed Jun 12 12:54:05 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0604860301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src43_1.ximg exists [Wed Jun 12 12:54:05 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0604860301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src43.csv [Wed Jun 12 12:54:05 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0604860301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src43_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0604860301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src43.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Jun 12 12:54:39 2013] Source 39 is offset by 1.512401 and -0.918373 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.014051 x 1.014051, not incorporating fit results [Wed Jun 12 12:54:39 2013] Source 39 is offset by -4.733958 and -3.061228 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.217513 x 1.217513, not incorporating fit results [Wed Jun 12 12:54:39 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Wed Jun 12 12:54:39 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Wed Jun 12 12:54:39 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Wed Jun 12 12:54:39 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Wed Jun 12 12:54:39 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Wed Jun 12 12:55:02 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.82 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Wed Jun 12 12:55:02 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.82" [Wed Jun 12 12:55:02 2013] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.978 [Wed Jun 12 12:55:02 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 38 for pass 1, mean size = 8.82" [Wed Jun 12 12:55:03 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0604860301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src38.ximg exists [Wed Jun 12 12:55:03 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0604860301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src38.csv [Wed Jun 12 12:55:03 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0604860301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src38_1.ximg exists [Wed Jun 12 12:55:03 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0604860301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src38.csv [Wed Jun 12 12:55:03 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0604860301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src38_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0604860301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src38.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Jun 12 12:55:04 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0604860301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src38.ximg exists [Wed Jun 12 12:55:04 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0604860301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src38.csv [Wed Jun 12 12:55:04 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0604860301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src38_1.ximg exists [Wed Jun 12 12:55:04 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0604860301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src38.csv [Wed Jun 12 12:55:04 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0604860301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src38_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0604860301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src38.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Jun 12 12:55:29 2013] Warning: source 38 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 39 at 11.243477 pixels away [Wed Jun 12 12:55:29 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Wed Jun 12 12:55:29 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Wed Jun 12 12:55:29 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Wed Jun 12 12:55:29 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Wed Jun 12 12:55:29 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Wed Jun 12 12:55:29 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0