[Wed May 30 09:21:35 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (289.3, 240.6) = 5 40 41.84 -66 43 0.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 51.2 +/- 12.8
  Background counts = 43.1
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0003

[Wed May 30 09:21:35 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.25'
[Wed May 30 09:43:39 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.55 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed May 30 09:43:39 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.55"
[Wed May 30 09:43:39 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 24, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.028
[Wed May 30 09:43:39 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 31 for pass 0, mean size = 8.55"
[Wed May 30 12:16:04 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0604590401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src31.ximg exists
[Wed May 30 12:16:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0604590401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src31.csv
[Wed May 30 12:16:04 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0604590401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src31_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 30 12:16:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0604590401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src31.csv
[Wed May 30 12:16:04 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0604590401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src31_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0604590401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src31.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 30 12:16:04 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0604590401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src31.ximg exists
[Wed May 30 12:16:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0604590401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src31.csv
[Wed May 30 12:16:04 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0604590401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src31_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 30 12:16:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0604590401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src31.csv
[Wed May 30 12:16:04 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0604590401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src31_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0604590401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src31.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 30 12:16:14 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 437.979000, observed total counts = 383.000000
[Wed May 30 12:16:14 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 30
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Wed May 30 12:16:14 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed May 30 12:16:14 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed May 30 12:16:14 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed May 30 12:16:14 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed May 30 12:16:14 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed May 30 20:30:29 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.55 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed May 30 20:30:29 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.55"
[Wed May 30 20:30:29 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 24, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.028
[Wed May 30 20:30:29 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 30 for pass 1, mean size = 8.55"
[Thu May 31 00:02:19 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0604590401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src30.ximg exists
[Thu May 31 00:02:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0604590401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src30.csv
[Thu May 31 00:02:19 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0604590401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src30_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 31 00:02:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0604590401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src30.csv
[Thu May 31 00:02:19 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0604590401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src30_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0604590401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src30.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May 31 00:02:19 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0604590401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src30.ximg exists
[Thu May 31 00:02:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0604590401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src30.csv
[Thu May 31 00:02:19 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0604590401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src30_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 31 00:02:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0604590401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src30.csv
[Thu May 31 00:02:19 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0604590401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src30_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0604590401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src30.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May 31 00:02:27 2012] Source 30 is offset by 6.736339 and -7.064941 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.983375 x 0.983375, not incorporating fit results
[Thu May 31 00:02:27 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu May 31 00:02:27 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu May 31 00:02:27 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu May 31 00:02:27 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu May 31 00:02:27 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu May 31 00:02:27 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0