[Mon May 13 03:54:02 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (250.3, 230.4) = 17 45 52.10 -29 3 56.5
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 109.2 +/- 16.5
  Background counts = 161.6
  Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.0008

[Mon May 13 03:54:02 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.04'
[Mon May 13 03:58:43 2013] Using EEF radius (= 9.45 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May 13 03:58:43 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.45"
[Mon May 13 03:58:43 2013] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 28, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.560
[Mon May 13 03:58:43 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 36 for pass 0, mean size = 9.45"
[Mon May 13 05:17:01 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0604300901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src36.ximg exists
[Mon May 13 05:17:01 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0604300901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src36.csv
[Mon May 13 05:17:01 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0604300901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src36_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 13 05:17:01 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0604300901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src36.csv
[Mon May 13 05:17:01 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0604300901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src36_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0604300901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src36.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 13 05:17:02 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0604300901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src36.ximg exists
[Mon May 13 05:17:02 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0604300901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src36.csv
[Mon May 13 05:17:02 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0604300901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src36_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 13 05:17:02 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0604300901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src36.csv
[Mon May 13 05:17:02 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0604300901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src36_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0604300901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src36.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 13 07:57:32 2013] Source 39 is offset by 1.981266 and 0.509913 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.086248 x 1.086248, not incorporating fit results
[Mon May 13 07:57:32 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon May 13 07:57:32 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon May 13 07:57:32 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon May 13 07:57:32 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon May 13 07:57:32 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon May 13 07:57:58 2013] Using EEF radius (= 9.45 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May 13 07:57:58 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.45"
[Mon May 13 07:57:58 2013] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 28, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.560
[Mon May 13 07:57:58 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 29 for pass 1, mean size = 9.45"
[Mon May 13 09:07:27 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0604300901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src29.ximg exists
[Mon May 13 09:07:27 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0604300901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src29.csv
[Mon May 13 09:07:27 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0604300901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src29_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 13 09:07:27 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0604300901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src29.csv
[Mon May 13 09:07:27 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0604300901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src29_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0604300901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src29.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 13 09:07:28 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0604300901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src29.ximg exists
[Mon May 13 09:07:28 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0604300901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src29.csv
[Mon May 13 09:07:28 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0604300901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src29_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 13 09:07:28 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0604300901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src29.csv
[Mon May 13 09:07:28 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0604300901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src29_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0604300901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src29.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 13 10:50:54 2013] Source 39 is offset by 1.941613 and 0.478595 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.086248 x 1.086248, not incorporating fit results
[Mon May 13 10:50:54 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon May 13 10:50:54 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon May 13 10:50:54 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon May 13 10:50:54 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon May 13 10:50:54 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon May 13 10:50:54 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0