[Mon Jun 3 03:44:53 2013] Detection parameters: Position = (317.5, 289.0) = 17 45 29.68 -28 59 41.4 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 238.4 +/- 31.0 Background counts = 362.2 Rate = 0.007 +/- 0.001 [Mon Jun 3 03:44:55 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.54' [Mon Jun 3 03:53:36 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.20 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon Jun 3 03:53:36 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.20" [Mon Jun 3 03:53:36 2013] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 20, frac = 1.077 [Mon Jun 3 03:53:36 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 58 for pass 0, mean size = 7.20" [Mon Jun 3 08:11:32 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0604300701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src58.ximg exists [Mon Jun 3 08:11:32 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0604300701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src58.csv [Mon Jun 3 08:11:32 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0604300701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src58_1.ximg exists [Mon Jun 3 08:11:32 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0604300701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src58.csv [Mon Jun 3 08:11:32 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0604300701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src58_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0604300701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src58.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Jun 3 08:11:34 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0604300701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src58.ximg exists [Mon Jun 3 08:11:34 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0604300701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src58.csv [Mon Jun 3 08:11:34 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0604300701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src58_1.ximg exists [Mon Jun 3 08:11:34 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0604300701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src58.csv [Mon Jun 3 08:11:34 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0604300701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src58_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0604300701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src58.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Jun 3 16:01:34 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 3280.680000, observed total counts = 2965.000000 [Mon Jun 3 16:01:34 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 63 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Mon Jun 3 16:01:34 2013] Warning, spatial fit 58 centroid is now closest to src. 61 [Mon Jun 3 16:01:34 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Mon Jun 3 16:01:34 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Mon Jun 3 16:01:34 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Mon Jun 3 16:01:34 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Mon Jun 3 16:01:34 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Mon Jun 3 16:01:34 2013] Source is confused with source 62 [Mon Jun 3 16:02:46 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.20 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon Jun 3 16:02:46 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.20" [Mon Jun 3 16:02:46 2013] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 20, frac = 1.077 [Mon Jun 3 16:02:46 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 53 for pass 1, mean size = 7.20" [Mon Jun 3 19:23:07 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0604300701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src53.ximg exists [Mon Jun 3 19:23:07 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0604300701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src53.csv [Mon Jun 3 19:23:07 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0604300701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src53_1.ximg exists [Mon Jun 3 19:23:07 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0604300701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src53.csv [Mon Jun 3 19:23:07 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0604300701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src53_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0604300701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src53.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Jun 3 19:23:09 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0604300701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src53.ximg exists [Mon Jun 3 19:23:09 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0604300701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src53.csv [Mon Jun 3 19:23:09 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0604300701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src53_1.ximg exists [Mon Jun 3 19:23:09 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0604300701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src53.csv [Mon Jun 3 19:23:09 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0604300701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src53_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0604300701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src53.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Jun 4 02:09:42 2013] Warning, spatial fit 53 centroid is now closest to src. 61 [Tue Jun 4 02:09:42 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue Jun 4 02:09:42 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue Jun 4 02:09:42 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Tue Jun 4 02:09:42 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Tue Jun 4 02:09:42 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue Jun 4 02:10:51 2013] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(27570.654663, 25096.387726, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Tue Jun 4 02:10:51 2013] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0604300701_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src63_src.reg [Tue Jun 4 02:10:51 2013] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0604300701_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (280, 252) - (355, 327) [Tue Jun 4 02:10:51 2013] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(27570.654663, 25096.387726, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24858.567800, 24183.457800, 993.680029, 836.888024, 35.352100, X, Y) && !ellipse(26954.687866, 26389.169281, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26159.565002, 25358.022278, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26654.496000, 25856.164000, 1069.144031, 1069.144031, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26941.850800, 23878.716949, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25261.690000, 22451.882000, 1108.648032, 1108.648032, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27783.914581, 26829.033295, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25890.144000, 26138.536000, 1069.288031, 1069.288031, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27702.545898, 26306.042969, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27236.651978, 25683.433289, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28106.864380, 25356.315094, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27677.270020, 24143.412750, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26627.304169, 22755.166962, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26286.204590, 22320.615662, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Tue Jun 4 02:10:51 2013] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0604300701_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src63.gif [Tue Jun 4 03:42:38 2013] Mean detx,y = (-2751.22, 576.91) [Tue Jun 4 03:42:46 2013] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum [Tue Jun 4 03:43:21 2013] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin [Tue Jun 4 03:43:22 2013] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0604300701_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src63_src_b10.pi.gz [Tue Jun 4 03:43:22 2013] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0604300701_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src63_bgd.pi.gz [Tue Jun 4 05:18:13 2013] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done [Tue Jun 4 05:18:13 2013] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts [Tue Jun 4 10:21:09 2013] Updating aperture counts using extracted products [Tue Jun 4 10:21:09 2013] Total counts from fullrun_pn_xmm0604300701_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src63_src_b10.pi.gz = 2048.00 [Tue Jun 4 10:21:09 2013] Total counts from fullrun_pn_xmm0604300701_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src63_bgd.pi.gz = 4340.00 [Tue Jun 4 10:21:09 2013] Got source and background scale factors 1099320.000000, 2825357.000000 [Tue Jun 4 10:21:09 2013] User source parameters: Position = (317.5, 289.0) = 17 45 29.68 -28 59 41.4 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 Source aperture counts = 359.3 +/- 46.3 Background aperture counts = 1688.7 Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.001 [Tue Jun 4 10:21:09 2013] Updating counts from extracted products [Tue Jun 4 10:21:09 2013] Set source signif. to 359.35/41.09 = 8.74 [Tue Jun 4 10:21:19 2013] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00 [Tue Jun 4 10:21:19 2013] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00996, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0604300701_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src63.arf [Tue Jun 4 10:21:19 2013] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass [Tue Jun 4 10:21:19 2013] Updating source flux to 7.8e-14 [Tue Jun 4 10:22:46 2013] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting [Tue Jun 4 10:23:01 2013] xmm0604300701/analysis//spectral/fullrun_pn_xmm0604300701_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src63_pl.csv not found, spectral fit skipped or did not complete