[Mon Jun  3 03:46:02 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (222.3, 194.2) = 17 46 1.25 -29 6 36.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 76.6 +/- 15.9
  Background counts = 52.2
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0006

[Mon Jun  3 03:46:03 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 9.36'
[Mon Jun  3 08:11:34 2013] Using EEF radius (= 11.11 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jun  3 08:11:34 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.11"
[Mon Jun  3 08:11:34 2013] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 37, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.965
[Mon Jun  3 08:11:34 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 34 for pass 0, mean size = 11.11"
[Mon Jun  3 11:47:11 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0604300701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src34.ximg exists
[Mon Jun  3 11:47:11 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0604300701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src34.csv
[Mon Jun  3 11:47:11 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0604300701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src34_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun  3 11:47:11 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0604300701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src34.csv
[Mon Jun  3 11:47:11 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0604300701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src34_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0604300701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src34.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun  3 11:47:12 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0604300701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src34.ximg exists
[Mon Jun  3 11:47:12 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0604300701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src34.csv
[Mon Jun  3 11:47:12 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0604300701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src34_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun  3 11:47:12 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0604300701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src34.csv
[Mon Jun  3 11:47:12 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0604300701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src34_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0604300701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src34.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun  3 16:01:53 2013] Warning, spatial fit 34 centroid is now closest to src. 13
[Mon Jun  3 16:01:53 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jun  3 16:01:53 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jun  3 16:01:53 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jun  3 16:01:53 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jun  3 16:01:53 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jun  3 19:23:10 2013] Using EEF radius (= 11.11 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jun  3 19:23:10 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.11"
[Mon Jun  3 19:23:10 2013] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 37, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.965
[Mon Jun  3 19:23:10 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 30 for pass 1, mean size = 11.11"
[Mon Jun  3 22:25:37 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0604300701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src30.ximg exists
[Mon Jun  3 22:25:37 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0604300701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src30.csv
[Mon Jun  3 22:25:37 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0604300701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src30_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun  3 22:25:37 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0604300701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src30.csv
[Mon Jun  3 22:25:37 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0604300701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src30_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0604300701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src30.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun  3 22:25:39 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0604300701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src30.ximg exists
[Mon Jun  3 22:25:39 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0604300701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src30.csv
[Mon Jun  3 22:25:39 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0604300701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src30_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun  3 22:25:39 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0604300701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src30.csv
[Mon Jun  3 22:25:39 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0604300701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src30_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0604300701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src30.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun  4 02:09:58 2013] Warning: source 30 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 59 at 10.237099 pixels away
[Tue Jun  4 02:09:58 2013] Warning: source 33 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 59 at 30.793293 pixels away
[Tue Jun  4 02:09:58 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jun  4 02:09:58 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jun  4 02:09:58 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jun  4 02:09:58 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jun  4 02:09:58 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jun  4 02:09:58 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9