[Thu Aug 16 20:32:43 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (243.8, 342.7) = 5 38 47.24 -55 59 51.3
  Extent = 21.7" x 21.7", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 44.7 +/- 13.0
  Background counts = 475.6
  Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.001

[Thu Aug 16 20:32:43 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.10'
[Thu Aug 16 23:07:36 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.98 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Aug 16 23:07:36 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.98"
[Thu Aug 16 23:07:36 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 15, frac = 0.570
[Thu Aug 16 23:07:36 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 52 for pass 0, mean size = 8.98"
[Fri Aug 17 01:36:24 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0604010801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src52.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 17 01:36:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0604010801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src52.csv
[Fri Aug 17 01:36:24 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0604010801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src52_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 17 01:36:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0604010801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src52.csv
[Fri Aug 17 01:36:24 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0604010801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src52_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0604010801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src52.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Aug 17 01:36:25 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0604010801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src52.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 17 01:36:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0604010801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src52.csv
[Fri Aug 17 01:36:25 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0604010801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src52_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 17 01:36:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0604010801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src52.csv
[Fri Aug 17 01:36:25 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0604010801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src52_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0604010801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src52.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Aug 17 01:36:45 2012] Source 55 is offset by 4.791017 and 7.958746 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.032060 x 1.032060, not incorporating fit results
[Fri Aug 17 01:36:45 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Aug 17 01:36:45 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Aug 17 01:36:45 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Aug 17 01:36:45 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Aug 17 01:36:45 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Aug 17 04:12:05 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.98 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Aug 17 04:12:05 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.98"
[Fri Aug 17 04:12:05 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 15, frac = 0.570
[Fri Aug 17 04:12:05 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 49 for pass 1, mean size = 8.98"
[Fri Aug 17 06:05:46 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0604010801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src49.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 17 06:05:46 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0604010801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src49.csv
[Fri Aug 17 06:05:46 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0604010801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src49_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 17 06:05:46 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0604010801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src49.csv
[Fri Aug 17 06:05:46 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0604010801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src49_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0604010801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src49.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Aug 17 06:05:47 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0604010801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src49.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 17 06:05:47 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0604010801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src49.csv
[Fri Aug 17 06:05:47 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0604010801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src49_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 17 06:05:47 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0604010801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src49.csv
[Fri Aug 17 06:05:47 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0604010801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src49_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0604010801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src49.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Aug 17 06:06:06 2012] Warning: source 49 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 55 at 16.916338 pixels away
[Fri Aug 17 06:06:07 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Aug 17 06:06:07 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Aug 17 06:06:07 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Aug 17 06:06:07 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Aug 17 06:06:07 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Aug 17 06:06:07 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0