[Mon Apr 30 21:32:30 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (226.3, 359.4) = 16 43 24.68 -54 25 9.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 139.3 +/- 17.9
  Background counts = 159.9
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0005

[Mon Apr 30 21:32:37 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.85'
[Mon Apr 30 21:38:49 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.85 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Apr 30 21:38:49 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.85"
[Mon Apr 30 21:38:49 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 30, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.654
[Mon Apr 30 21:38:49 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 92 for pass 0, mean size = 9.85"
[Tue May  1 03:48:15 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src92.ximg exists
[Tue May  1 03:48:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src92.csv
[Tue May  1 03:48:15 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src92_1.ximg exists
[Tue May  1 03:48:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src92.csv
[Tue May  1 03:48:15 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src92_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src92.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May  1 03:48:19 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src92.ximg exists
[Tue May  1 03:48:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src92.csv
[Tue May  1 03:48:19 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src92_1.ximg exists
[Tue May  1 03:48:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src92.csv
[Tue May  1 03:48:19 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src92_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src92.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May  1 12:21:37 2012] Warning, spatial fit 92 centroid is now closest to src. 78
[Tue May  1 12:21:37 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May  1 12:21:37 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May  1 12:21:37 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue May  1 12:21:37 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May  1 12:21:37 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May  1 12:23:13 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.85 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May  1 12:23:13 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.85"
[Tue May  1 12:23:13 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 30, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.654
[Tue May  1 12:23:13 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 89 for pass 1, mean size = 9.85"
[Tue May  1 21:49:12 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src89.ximg exists
[Tue May  1 21:49:12 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src89_1.ximg exists
[Tue May  1 21:49:12 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src89 appears to have run properly
[Tue May  1 21:49:14 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src89.ximg exists
[Tue May  1 21:49:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src89.csv
[Tue May  1 21:49:15 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src89_1.ximg exists
[Tue May  1 21:49:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src89.csv
[Tue May  1 21:49:15 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src89_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src89.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May  2 07:09:59 2012] Warning, spatial fit 89 centroid is now closest to src. 78
[Wed May  2 07:09:59 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed May  2 07:09:59 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed May  2 07:09:59 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed May  2 07:09:59 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed May  2 07:09:59 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed May  2 07:11:38 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(19636.361130, 31220.316345, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Wed May  2 07:11:38 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src94_src.reg
[Wed May  2 07:11:38 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (189, 322) - (264, 397)
[Wed May  2 07:11:38 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(19636.361130, 31220.316345, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(17334.894000, 34983.884000, 1804.264052, 1804.264052, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(19509.648529, 33571.281067, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(18578.847031, 32144.930298, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(20355.607239, 31972.077271, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(20915.207764, 31661.162720, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(20371.820175, 31464.050690, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(20148.452560, 30549.536469, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(16781.786469, 29941.171021, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22309.838898, 29179.557281, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Wed May  2 07:11:38 2012] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src94.gif
[Wed May  2 10:51:11 2012] Mean detx,y = (5201.03, 6837.71) 
[Wed May  2 10:51:16 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Wed May  2 10:51:55 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Wed May  2 10:51:56 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src94_src_b10.pi.gz
[Wed May  2 10:51:56 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src94_bgd.pi.gz
[Wed May  2 16:39:12 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done
[Wed May  2 16:39:12 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Wed May  2 23:18:14 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Wed May  2 23:18:14 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src94_src_b10.pi.gz
[Wed May  2 23:18:24 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Wed May  2 23:18:24 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00364, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src94.arf
[Wed May  2 23:18:24 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Wed May  2 23:18:24 2012] Updating source flux to 1.6e-14
[Wed May  2 23:36:14 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting