[Mon Apr 30 21:32:30 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (241.0, 364.5) = 16 43 17.35 -54 24 44.3 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 155.6 +/- 19.7 Background counts = 154.7 Rate = 0.007 +/- 0.0009 [Mon Apr 30 21:32:37 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.35' [Mon Apr 30 21:38:49 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.60 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon Apr 30 21:38:49 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.60" [Mon Apr 30 21:38:49 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 29, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.853 [Mon Apr 30 21:38:49 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 87 for pass 0, mean size = 9.60" [Tue May 1 03:48:15 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src87.ximg exists [Tue May 1 03:48:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src87.csv [Tue May 1 03:48:15 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src87_1.ximg exists [Tue May 1 03:48:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src87.csv [Tue May 1 03:48:15 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src87_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src87.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue May 1 03:48:18 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src87.ximg exists [Tue May 1 03:48:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src87.csv [Tue May 1 03:48:18 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src87_1.ximg exists [Tue May 1 03:48:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src87.csv [Tue May 1 03:48:18 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src87_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src87.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue May 1 12:21:37 2012] Warning, spatial fit 87 centroid is now closest to src. 79 [Tue May 1 12:21:37 2012] Warning: source 91 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 89 at 11.386291 pixels away [Tue May 1 12:21:37 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue May 1 12:21:37 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue May 1 12:21:37 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Tue May 1 12:21:37 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Tue May 1 12:21:37 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue May 1 12:21:37 2012] Source is confused with source 79 [Tue May 1 12:23:13 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.60 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue May 1 12:23:13 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.60" [Tue May 1 12:23:13 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 29, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.853 [Tue May 1 12:23:13 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 85 for pass 1, mean size = 9.60" [Tue May 1 21:49:12 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src85.ximg exists [Tue May 1 21:49:12 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src85.csv [Tue May 1 21:49:12 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src85_1.ximg exists [Tue May 1 21:49:12 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src85.csv [Tue May 1 21:49:12 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src85_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src85.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue May 1 21:49:14 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src85.ximg exists [Tue May 1 21:49:14 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src85.csv [Tue May 1 21:49:14 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src85_1.ximg exists [Tue May 1 21:49:14 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src85.csv [Tue May 1 21:49:14 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src85_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src85.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed May 2 07:09:59 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1684.020000, observed total counts = 1405.000000 [Wed May 2 07:09:59 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 89 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Wed May 2 07:09:59 2012] Source 89 is offset by -2.954302 and -7.437578 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.114556 x 1.114556, not incorporating fit results [Wed May 2 07:09:59 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Wed May 2 07:09:59 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Wed May 2 07:09:59 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Wed May 2 07:09:59 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Wed May 2 07:09:59 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Wed May 2 07:11:38 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(20915.207764, 31661.162720, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Wed May 2 07:11:38 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src89_src.reg [Wed May 2 07:11:38 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (203, 327) - (278, 402) [Wed May 2 07:11:38 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(20915.207764, 31661.162720, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24451.632000, 35051.540000, 1615.856046, 1615.856046, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(17334.894000, 34983.884000, 1804.264052, 1804.264052, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25196.248000, 34257.600000, 3231.712093, 3231.712093, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(17988.738892, 34433.042511, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23508.956000, 33872.673200, 1599.248046, 1599.248046, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(19509.648529, 33571.281067, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(18578.847031, 32144.930298, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(20355.607239, 31972.077271, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(20371.820175, 31464.050690, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(19636.361130, 31220.316345, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23071.994000, 30411.776000, 693.571220, 693.571220, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(20148.452560, 30549.536469, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23440.224000, 30151.866100, 1249.392036, 672.848819, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23750.978180, 30046.780121, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22309.838898, 29179.557281, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23712.867889, 29031.544708, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23070.167603, 28707.976288, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Wed May 2 07:11:38 2012] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src89.gif [Wed May 2 10:45:00 2012] Mean detx,y = (3998.71, 7280.85) [Wed May 2 10:45:06 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum [Wed May 2 10:45:47 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin [Wed May 2 10:45:47 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src89_src_b10.pi.gz [Wed May 2 10:45:47 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src89_bgd.pi.gz [Wed May 2 16:28:15 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done [Wed May 2 16:28:15 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts [Wed May 2 23:18:14 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products [Wed May 2 23:18:14 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src89_src_b10.pi.gz [Wed May 2 23:18:24 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00 [Wed May 2 23:18:24 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00725, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0603220201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src89.arf [Wed May 2 23:18:24 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass [Wed May 2 23:18:24 2012] Updating source flux to 2.9e-14 [Wed May 2 23:36:14 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting