[Sat May 19 16:57:35 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (449.6, 304.3) = 3 16 48.10 -44 13 10.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 145.4 +/- 22.3
  Background counts = 153.3
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0002

[Sat May 19 16:57:36 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.96'
[Sat May 19 17:07:10 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.91 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat May 19 17:07:10 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.91"
[Sat May 19 17:07:10 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 41, mask sum = 48, frac = 1.144
[Sat May 19 17:07:10 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 73 for pass 0, mean size = 11.91"
[Sun May 20 00:02:27 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src73.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 00:02:27 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src73.csv
[Sun May 20 00:02:27 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src73_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 00:02:27 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src73.csv
[Sun May 20 00:02:27 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src73_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src73.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May 20 00:02:29 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src73.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 00:02:29 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src73.csv
[Sun May 20 00:02:29 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src73_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 00:02:29 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src73.csv
[Sun May 20 00:02:29 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src73_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src73.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May 20 06:37:30 2012] Warning: source 73 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 78 at 14.897573 pixels away
[Sun May 20 06:37:30 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun May 20 06:37:30 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun May 20 06:37:30 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun May 20 06:37:30 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun May 20 06:37:30 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun May 20 06:38:06 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.91 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May 20 06:38:06 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.91"
[Sun May 20 06:38:06 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 41, mask sum = 48, frac = 1.144
[Sun May 20 06:38:06 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 60 for pass 1, mean size = 11.91"
[Sun May 20 11:36:36 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src60.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 11:36:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src60.csv
[Sun May 20 11:36:36 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src60_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 11:36:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src60.csv
[Sun May 20 11:36:36 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src60_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src60.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May 20 11:36:38 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src60.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 11:36:38 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src60.csv
[Sun May 20 11:36:38 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src60_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 11:36:38 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src60.csv
[Sun May 20 11:36:38 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src60_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src60.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May 20 14:56:56 2012] Warning: source 60 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 78 at 14.142035 pixels away
[Sun May 20 14:56:57 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun May 20 14:56:57 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun May 20 14:56:57 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun May 20 14:56:57 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun May 20 14:56:57 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun May 20 14:56:57 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9