[Sat May 19 16:57:34 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (406.5, 356.5) = 3 17 5.56 -44 9 24.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 137.5 +/- 21.0
  Background counts = 172.1
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0002

[Sat May 19 16:57:36 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.90'
[Sat May 19 17:07:10 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.88 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat May 19 17:07:10 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.88"
[Sat May 19 17:07:10 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 36, mask sum = 34, frac = 0.944
[Sat May 19 17:07:10 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 50 for pass 0, mean size = 10.88"
[Sun May 20 00:02:27 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src50.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 00:02:27 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src50.csv
[Sun May 20 00:02:27 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src50_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 00:02:27 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src50.csv
[Sun May 20 00:02:27 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src50_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src50.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May 20 00:02:28 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src50.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 00:02:28 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src50.csv
[Sun May 20 00:02:28 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src50_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 00:02:28 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src50.csv
[Sun May 20 00:02:28 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src50_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src50.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May 20 06:37:30 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1789.200000, observed total counts = 1485.000000
[Sun May 20 06:37:30 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 54
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sun May 20 06:37:30 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun May 20 06:37:30 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun May 20 06:37:30 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun May 20 06:37:30 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun May 20 06:37:30 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun May 20 06:38:06 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.88 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May 20 06:38:06 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.88"
[Sun May 20 06:38:06 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 36, mask sum = 34, frac = 0.944
[Sun May 20 06:38:06 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 41 for pass 1, mean size = 10.88"
[Sun May 20 11:36:36 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src41.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 11:36:36 2012] Warning: model total counts is not > 0 in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src41.csv
[Sun May 20 11:36:36 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src41_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 11:36:36 2012] Warning: model total counts is not > 0 in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src41.csv
[Sun May 20 11:36:36 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src41_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src41.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May 20 11:36:37 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src41.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 11:36:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src41.csv
[Sun May 20 11:36:37 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src41_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 11:36:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src41.csv
[Sun May 20 11:36:37 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src41_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src41.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May 20 14:56:56 2012] Source 54 is offset by 6.875658 and -5.107191 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.294418 x 1.294418, not incorporating fit results
[Sun May 20 14:56:56 2012] Warning: source 41 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 54 at 15.959442 pixels away
[Sun May 20 14:56:56 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun May 20 14:56:56 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun May 20 14:56:56 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun May 20 14:56:56 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun May 20 14:56:56 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun May 20 14:56:57 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9