[Sat May 19 16:58:49 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (310.7, 365.6) = 3 17 44.31 -44 8 44.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 187.1 +/- 22.0
  Background counts = 129.3
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0003

[Sat May 19 16:58:51 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.95'
[Sun May 20 02:53:18 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.90 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May 20 02:53:18 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.90"
[Sun May 20 02:53:18 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.963
[Sun May 20 02:53:18 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 28 for pass 0, mean size = 8.90"
[Sun May 20 06:37:06 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 06:37:06 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28.csv
[Sun May 20 06:37:06 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 06:37:06 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28.csv
[Sun May 20 06:37:06 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May 20 06:37:07 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 06:37:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28.csv
[Sun May 20 06:37:07 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 06:37:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28.csv
[Sun May 20 06:37:07 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May 20 06:37:48 2012] Warning: source 28 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 26 at 10.859550 pixels away
[Sun May 20 06:37:49 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun May 20 06:37:49 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun May 20 06:37:49 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun May 20 06:37:49 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun May 20 06:37:49 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun May 20 13:42:39 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.90 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May 20 13:42:39 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.90"
[Sun May 20 13:42:39 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.963
[Sun May 20 13:42:39 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 23 for pass 1, mean size = 8.90"
[Sun May 20 14:56:28 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 14:56:28 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23.csv
[Sun May 20 14:56:28 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 14:56:28 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23.csv
[Sun May 20 14:56:28 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May 20 14:56:29 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 14:56:29 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23.csv
[Sun May 20 14:56:29 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 14:56:29 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23.csv
[Sun May 20 14:56:29 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May 20 14:57:18 2012] Warning, spatial fit 23 centroid is now closest to src. 23
[Sun May 20 14:57:18 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun May 20 14:57:18 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun May 20 14:57:18 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun May 20 14:57:18 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun May 20 14:57:18 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun May 20 14:57:18 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9