[Sat May 19 16:58:09 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (94.5, 241.1) = 3 19 11.88 -44 17 43.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 128.2 +/- 17.5
  Background counts = 44.6
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0002

[Sat May 19 16:58:10 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 15.36'
[Sun May 20 00:02:29 2012] Using EEF radius (= 14.11 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May 20 00:02:29 2012] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Sun May 20 00:02:29 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 14.11"
[Sun May 20 00:02:29 2012] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 56, mask sum = 56, frac = 0.999
[Sun May 20 00:02:29 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 41 for pass 0, mean size = 14.11"
[Sun May 20 02:53:17 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src41.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 02:53:17 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src41.csv
[Sun May 20 02:53:17 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src41_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 02:53:17 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src41.csv
[Sun May 20 02:53:17 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src41_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src41.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May 20 02:53:18 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src41.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 02:53:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src41.csv
[Sun May 20 02:53:18 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src41_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 02:53:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src41.csv
[Sun May 20 02:53:18 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src41_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src41.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May 20 06:37:40 2012] Warning, spatial fit 41 centroid is now closest to src. 30
[Sun May 20 06:37:40 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun May 20 06:37:40 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun May 20 06:37:40 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun May 20 06:37:40 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun May 20 06:37:40 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun May 20 11:36:38 2012] Using EEF radius (= 14.11 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May 20 11:36:38 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 14.11"
[Sun May 20 11:36:38 2012] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 56, mask sum = 56, frac = 0.999
[Sun May 20 11:36:38 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 36 for pass 1, mean size = 14.11"
[Sun May 20 13:42:38 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src36.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 13:42:38 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src36.csv
[Sun May 20 13:42:38 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src36_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 13:42:38 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src36.csv
[Sun May 20 13:42:38 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src36_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src36.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May 20 13:42:39 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src36.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 13:42:39 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src36.csv
[Sun May 20 13:42:39 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src36_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 13:42:39 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src36.csv
[Sun May 20 13:42:39 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src36_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src36.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May 20 14:57:08 2012] Warning: source 36 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 34 at 18.682665 pixels away
[Sun May 20 14:57:08 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun May 20 14:57:08 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun May 20 14:57:08 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun May 20 14:57:08 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun May 20 14:57:08 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun May 20 14:57:08 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9