[Sat May 19 16:58:09 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (313.5, 291.3) = 3 17 43.17 -44 14 6.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 125.1 +/- 25.5
  Background counts = 274.8
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0003

[Sat May 19 16:58:10 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.21'
[Sun May 20 00:02:29 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.03 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May 20 00:02:29 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.03"
[Sun May 20 00:02:29 2012] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 17, mask sum = 20, frac = 1.116
[Sun May 20 00:02:29 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 36 for pass 0, mean size = 7.03"
[Sun May 20 02:53:17 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src36.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 02:53:17 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src36.csv
[Sun May 20 02:53:17 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src36_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 02:53:17 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src36.csv
[Sun May 20 02:53:17 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src36_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src36.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May 20 02:53:18 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src36.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 02:53:18 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src36_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 02:53:18 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src36 appears to have run properly
[Sun May 20 06:37:40 2012] Source 20 is offset by -5.620478 and 5.772060 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.765940 x 1.765940, not incorporating fit results
[Sun May 20 06:37:40 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun May 20 06:37:40 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun May 20 06:37:40 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun May 20 06:37:40 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun May 20 06:37:40 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun May 20 06:37:40 2012] Source is confused with source 19
[Sun May 20 11:36:38 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.03 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May 20 11:36:38 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.03"
[Sun May 20 11:36:38 2012] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 17, mask sum = 20, frac = 1.116
[Sun May 20 11:36:38 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 31 for pass 1, mean size = 7.03"
[Sun May 20 13:42:38 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src31.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 13:42:38 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src31_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 13:42:38 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src31 appears to have run properly
[Sun May 20 13:42:39 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src31.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 13:42:39 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src31_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 13:42:39 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0603050101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src31 appears to have run properly
[Sun May 20 14:57:08 2012] Source 20 is offset by -5.625903 and 5.772060 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.763871 x 1.763871, not incorporating fit results
[Sun May 20 14:57:08 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun May 20 14:57:08 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun May 20 14:57:08 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun May 20 14:57:08 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun May 20 14:57:08 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun May 20 14:57:08 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9