[Mon Mar 12 23:25:48 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (326.0, 231.9) = 5 17 39.07 -68 33 15.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 59.4 +/- 10.5
  Background counts = 15.2
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0008

[Mon Mar 12 23:25:49 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.22'
[Tue Mar 13 00:05:54 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.04 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Mar 13 00:05:54 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.04"
[Tue Mar 13 00:05:54 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 30, frac = 1.128
[Tue Mar 13 00:05:54 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 0, mean size = 9.04"
[Tue Mar 13 00:22:49 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0602980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 13 00:22:49 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0602980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv
[Tue Mar 13 00:22:49 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0602980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 13 00:22:49 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0602980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv
[Tue Mar 13 00:22:49 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0602980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0602980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Mar 13 00:22:49 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0602980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 13 00:22:49 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0602980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Tue Mar 13 00:22:49 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0602980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 13 00:22:49 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0602980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Tue Mar 13 00:22:49 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0602980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0602980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Mar 13 00:23:00 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 209.362000, observed total counts = 177.000000
[Tue Mar 13 00:23:00 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 8
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue Mar 13 00:23:00 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Mar 13 00:23:00 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Mar 13 00:23:00 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Mar 13 00:23:00 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Mar 13 00:23:00 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Mar 13 01:02:49 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.04 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Mar 13 01:02:49 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.04"
[Tue Mar 13 01:02:49 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 30, frac = 1.128
[Tue Mar 13 01:02:49 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 1, mean size = 9.04"
[Tue Mar 13 01:21:37 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0602980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 13 01:21:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0602980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.csv
[Tue Mar 13 01:21:37 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0602980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5_1.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 13 01:21:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0602980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.csv
[Tue Mar 13 01:21:37 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0602980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0602980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Mar 13 01:21:37 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0602980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 13 01:21:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0602980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Tue Mar 13 01:21:37 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0602980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 13 01:21:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0602980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Tue Mar 13 01:21:37 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0602980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0602980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Mar 13 01:21:48 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 209.469000, observed total counts = 177.000000
[Tue Mar 13 01:21:48 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 8
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue Mar 13 01:21:48 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Mar 13 01:21:48 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Mar 13 01:21:48 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Mar 13 01:21:48 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Mar 13 01:21:48 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Mar 13 01:56:48 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(28315.459412, 20123.686447, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Tue Mar 13 01:56:48 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_mos2_xmm0602980201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src8_src.reg
[Tue Mar 13 01:56:48 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_mos2_xmm0602980201_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (289, 194) - (364, 269)
[Tue Mar 13 01:56:48 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(28315.459412, 20123.686447, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y)
[Tue Mar 13 01:56:48 2012] Writing fullrun_mos2_xmm0602980201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src8.gif
[Tue Mar 13 01:58:44 2012] Mean detx,y = (5518.35, -6129.93) 
[Tue Mar 13 01:58:46 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Tue Mar 13 01:59:45 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Tue Mar 13 01:59:45 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_mos2_xmm0602980201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src8_src_b10.pi.gz
[Tue Mar 13 01:59:45 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_mos2_xmm0602980201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src8_bgd.pi.gz
[Tue Mar 13 02:07:09 2012] Not generating rmf since there are only 59 counts
[Tue Mar 13 02:07:09 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Tue Mar 13 02:08:41 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Tue Mar 13 02:08:41 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_mos2_xmm0602980201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src8_src_b10.pi.gz
[Tue Mar 13 02:08:41 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Tue Mar 13 02:08:41 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00431, arf fullrun_mos2_xmm0602980201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src8.arf
[Tue Mar 13 02:08:41 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Tue Mar 13 02:08:41 2012] Updating source flux to 6.6e-14
[Tue Mar 13 02:09:02 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting